[St. Louis, October 1885.]
The newspapers here
now state that the Ohio election has gone fairly and conclusively to the
Republicans, and pronounce you as the cause. So, apart from the immediate
results and the influence it may have on other elections, it will introduce the
"Bloody Shirt" as a part of the Republican doctrine. Of course the
name "Bloody Shirt" is pure bosh, like the old political cries of
"Black Republicans," "Niggers," etc., etc., so familiar to
us in 1860-61. I understand your position to be that by Section 2, Article 14,
Amendments of the Constitution, by which Representatives in Congress are
apportioned, the South gained in numbers, and yet practically have defeated the
main purpose of the Amendment. Now, as Congress had the power to enforce that
Section by the Fifth Section, I am asked why it was not done when the
Republicans had the Government. So far as I can learn the negroes at the South
are protected and encouraged in gaining property and education; also in voting
when their vote does not affect the result. But the feeling is universal
against their "ruling white men." How force or law can be brought to
bear is the most difficult problem I can conceive of, and I think you are
perfectly right in making the issue; a good result will follow from its fair,
open discussion. My notion is that the negro himself will have to fight for his
right of suffrage, but the laws of the United States for electing Members of
the House should be made as strong as possible, to encourage the negroes in
voting for their candidates, and, if need be, fighting for their right when
they have an undoubted majority. . . .
SOURCE: Rachel
Sherman Thorndike, Editor, The Sherman Letters: Correspondence Between
General and Senator Sherman from 1837 to 1891, p. 367-8
No comments:
Post a Comment