(Correspondence of
the Hawk-Eye.)
DES MOINES, March 17,
1862.
MR. EDITOR:– As the days begin to warm and lengthen, and the
footsteps of Spring advances over the disappearing snows, the impatience with a
Legislative session, that has already grown to an unprofitable length, becomes
more and more manifest among the farmer members. It is manifestly not only their interest but pleasure
to do up what business remains on the table with the utmost possible dispatch,
and be away to their homes and the congenial pursuits of the farm. As the agricultural interest is largely in
the majority in the Assembly, it must be considered that a long session is a
matter of necessity rather than a matter of choice, so far as farmers can
control it. The time has come when they
will not look with any degree of allowance upon a long speech, and hence, calls
for the “previous question” and motions to “lie on the table” are becoming quite
frequent.
Yet there are some questions to be acted upon which demand earnest attention, fair argument and much
deliberation, and it will be a happy thing for the State if gentleman
legislators shall possess sufficient moral courage “to face a frowning”
constituency for having remained a few days longer to look after the true
interests of the people. No man who is
not a thief at heart will, for the sake of his per diem, be willing to protract
the session a day longer than the public welfare and a just regard to the
business demands. Still there are those
who, have, for the sake of being regarded
great economists of time and money, wasted much of both, in arguing, many
weeks ago, the necessity of fixing an
early day for adjournment. The people
should mark them and they should be held to a strict account. Many of them have been dying to appear to wish an early adjournment,
when, in reality, they had but little idea of the amount of labor which it was
absolutely necessary of the assembly to accomplish, and were, of all men, at
heart, not anxious for a long session.
The matters connected with the “Des Moines Improvement,” “Railroads,” “Congressional
Apportionment,” the “County Court Bill” and “Military Bill” are to be disposed
of, and, yet, had the apparent wishes
and judgment of certain gentlemen in the House been consulted, an adjournment
would have taken place before this time.
On Saturday quite a flutter was created in the House, in
Democratic ranks, by the introduction of a bill which provides more perfect
safe guard around the ballot-box. The
bill contains a simple provision that, in case of challenge at election, an
affidavit shall be substituted for the mere verbal oath now prescribed. It simply contemplates the perpetuation of
evidence against any one who may be disposed to swear falsely. Of course, it operates upon all classes, the
foreign and native-born alike, and yet Democracy cried “Know-Nothingism,” “Proscription,”
&c. Unless Republicans allow
themselves to be driven from their propriety by this silly cry from the
advocates of an effete, broken down and disorganized party, I think the measure
will become law. It is very clear that there
are many illegal voters who have been acting with the said Democratic party,
and from whom it derives a large share of its strength, who would pause and
hesitate before subscribing their
names to a deliberate falsehood.
The file leaders see this, and hence the opposition with
which the measure is assailed. After due
consultation they were found a unit against it.
ARGUS.
– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye,
Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, March 29, 1862, p. 1
No comments:
Post a Comment