In St. Louis there are scores of dangerous men, zealous and
scheming rebels, who are both acting the part of spies in our camp, and, by
their position, presence, example and counsel, are rendering valuable service
to the enemy. The immunity with which they
have long done this emboldens others to follow in their footsteps, and gives
encouragement to the almost despairing foe in the field. It is time that these mischief makers were
placed where their influence would be powerless. The peace of the city, the welfare of the
State, and the cause of the country, as well as genuine kindness to these
disturbers and their friends, all demand this. – Justice, policy, precedent and
propriety alike require it.
During the struggle that gave birth to the Republic, the
country was grievously infested by active and bitter tories. In certain portions of the land they
especially abounded, and in some were actually predominant in numbers. They frustrated the efforts of patriots, gave
invaluable information to the enemy, and materially aided in protracting the
conflict. Many of them were wealthy,
educate, of high standing, had even gained a reputation for integrity, and thus
wielded an influence mischievous in the extreme. The journals of that time have since been
published, tell us how these citizens were disposed of. They were made to pay heavily for carrying on
the war, and were removed to some region where their power for evil
ceased. This course was adopted by the
advice and with the hearty concurrence of Washington.
In principle, the secessionists of this war are more
flagitious than the tories of ’76, and in practice those of them near our
military lines are worse. The difference
between the olden and the modern tory is purely circumstantial, and the
circumstances are in favor of the former.
The one breathed in the times of ’76, when a republic was an experiment,
the other knows that the experiment has been gloriously successful for four
score years. The one was opposed to a
government of the country by the people of the country, and the other is so
opposed. The first was unwilling to have
the people of the land rule the land, and the second is similarly
unwilling. But while one objected to
sacrifice, peace and the ties of the fatherland, with its hallowed memories and
proud historic associations, to enter upon a novel experiment under gloomy
auspices, the other invokes war, tramples upon every sentiment of national
price, outrages the glorious history and flag of his country, in order to render
abortive the tried and well proved experiment of national self government. Every sentiment that palliated the course of
the tory of ’76, aggravates that of the secessionist of to-day.
What plea can be urged in behalf of further tolerance to the
foe in our midst? Why has he more claim
to the shelter of constitutional law than the [foe] in the field? How, when his whole spirit, all his
aspirations, hopes, efforts and influence, are known to be hostile, is he not
amenable to the laws of war? Are the
friends and well wishers of the enemy to be indefinitely harbored and cherished
among us? – It is time that all illusions were at last dissipated, and that
many of our citizens, who seem to be still dreaming amid the terrible realities
upon us, were startled with a discovery of the serious nature of their
position. We are at war, St. Louis is a
military post, yet in all quarters she is infested with prying, hypocritical, plotting,
ingenious, implacable and deadliest foes.
What shouts of jubilee would they send up in our streets should some
chance of war enable the enemy, through their aid, to gain possession of St.
Louis? How much mercy would be shown to
their Union fellow-citizens? Not a
particle. Every Unionist would be banished, or imprisoned and his property
confiscated. The wealth of the
patriots of St. Louis has been by Sterling Price distinctly offered, though with
absurd imbecility, as the prize of his rebel horde! We urge no such wholesale treatment of those
here who may sympathize with the enemy. – Yet the busy leaders and conspicuous
intriguers among these sympathizers ought to be, and we trust soon will be,
marked and effectually disposed of.
– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye,
Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, February 8, 1862, p. 2
No comments:
Post a Comment