Naushon Island, August 12,1862.
My Dear Sir, — Your
favor of the 7th has been sent me here, where I am established for a month or
two, with a chance to visit Boston only occasionally. I am very glad that my
plan strikes you favorably. Governor Andrew made me a flying visit yesterday,
and seems to like the idea much; he had already made use of the slips I sent
him of the “aristocracy vs. popular government” by sending them to the
recruiting stations.
I sincerely hope a
thorough system may be inaugurated under your personal oversight in such a
manner as will shut off any attempt to use it either for personal ambition (i.
e. for lauding political or military aspirants), or even for pushing the
views of our most extreme Republicans. To do its best work, it needs to be
broader than any one set of men, even the best, belonging to our wing of the
Republican party. In other words, its aim should not be anti-slavery, except
incidentally, but should be “the vigorous prosecution of the war.” How would it
do to style it “the committee of correspondence upon the vigorous prosecution
of the war”?
Mr. George W.
Curtis, who is here, and has considerable experience with the press, thinks
there is some danger of jealousy from the press at the appearance of dictation
there would be in my original plan of sending with each article a circular from
the committee, suggesting its republication. If this be so, perhaps the best
mode would be to have our organization complete, but informal; that is to say,
not appearing before the public as a committee. The articles we wish to have
republished would, in most cases, if well selected, be adopted in each State,
either at the individual suggestion of our committeeman for that point, or they
might be sent anonymously with a printed or written line, saying, for instance,
that a “fellow-countryman calls your attention to the inclosed important article
as valuable for circulation.”
One of the most
important ends that could be gained by a judicious organization would be to
sink and obliterate the old party names and prejudices, especially those
connected with the name of democrat.
You and I have
fought under the Whig banner; one of our strongest allies is Mr. Bryant, the
leader of the only really Democratic party which ever existed. Yet we
constantly find our best Republican journals even now fighting “Democracy.” It
seems to me of vast importance to sink these old distinctions, and to put
before the voting and fighting masses, in the strongest light, the real issue —
of the war-Democratic or Republican [government], (whichever we may call the
government of the people) vs. Aristocratic government; in other words,
the people vs. a class. . . .
I give you a rough
sketch of an organization, and am very truly yours,
J. M. Forbes
SOURCE: Sarah
Forbes Hughes, Letters and Recollections of John Murray Forbes,
Volume 1, p. 326-7
No comments:
Post a Comment