Legation Of The United States,
London, September 5,
1863.
My Lord: At
this moment, when one of the iron-clad vessels is on the point of departure
from this kingdom, on its hostile errand against the United States, I am
honored with the reply of your lordship to my notes of the 11th, 16th and 25th
of July, and of the 14th of August. I trust 1 need not express bow profound is
my regret at the conclusion to which her Majesty's government have arrived. I
can regard it no otherwise than as practically opening to the insurgents free
liberty in this kingdom to execute a policy described in one of their late
publications in the following language:
“In the present state of the harbor
defences of New York, Boston, Portland, and smaller northern cities, such a
vessel as the Warrior would have little difficulty in entering any of these
ports and inflicting a vital blow upon the enemy. The destruction of Boston
alone would be worth a hundred victories in the field. It would bring such a
terror to the 'blue-noses,' as to cause them to wish eagerly for peace, despite
their overweening love of gain which has been so freely administered to since
the opening of this war. Vessels of the Warrior class would promptly raise the
blockade of our ports, and would even, in this respect, confer advantages which
would soon repay the cost of their construction.”
It would be superfluous in me to point out to your lordship
that this is war. No matter what may be the theory adopted of neutrality in a
struggle, when this process is carried on in the manner indicated, from a
territory and with the aid of the subjects of a third party, that third party
to all intents and purposes ceases to be neutral. Neither is it necessary to
show, that any- government which suffers it to be done fails in enforcing the
essential conditions of international amity towards the country against whom
the hostility is directed. In my belief it is impossible that any nation,
retaining a proper degree of self-respect, could tamely submit to a continuance
of relations so utterly deficient in reciprocity. I have no idea that Great
Britain would do so for a moment.
After a careful examination of the full instructions with
which I have been furnished, in preparation for such an emergency, I deem it
inexpedient for me to attempt any recurrence to arguments for effective
interposition in the present case[.] Under these circumstances, I prefer to desist
from communicating to your lordship even such further portions of my existing
instructions as are suited to the case, lest I should contribute to aggravate
difficulties already far too serious. I therefore content myself with informing
your lordship that I transmit, by the present steamer, a copy of your note for
the consideration of my government, and shall await the more specific
directions that will be contained in the reply.
I seize this opportunity to pray permission of your lordship
to correct a clerical error inadvertently made in my note of the 3d instant, in
inserting the date of two notes of mine as having received the express
approbation of my government. The intention was to specify only one, that of
the 11th of July. The correction is not material, excepting as it conforms more
strictly to the truth.
I pray your lordship to accept the assurances of the highest
consideration with which I have the honor to be, my lord, your most obedient
servant,
CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS.
Right Honorable Earl Russell, &c., &c., &c.
SOURCE: Message of the
President of the United States and Accompanying Documents, to both Houses of
Congress at the Commencement of the First Session of the 38th Congress, Part 1:
Papers Relating to the Foreign Affairs, p. 418-9
No comments:
Post a Comment