New York, April 8, 1862.
Sorry as I was to see your note of the 5th instead of
yourself, I was nevertheless glad to hear once more from you. I agree with you
regarding the absolute necessity of having the Mississippi. From the very beginning
of the Civil War I have been convinced that the two main problems immediately
to be solved were the possession of the whole Mississippi, and the conquest of
Virginia and North Carolina. That done, the rest of the military work would
soon and naturally follow. When I was lately in the West in search of one of my
sons, wounded in the capture of Fort Donelson, I found the spirit of the
soldiers excellent. The idea that the Mississippi belongs to them, in the
fullest sense of the term, pervaded all, officer and private; and every one
seemed fully to rely on General Halleck for the execution of that great work.
General Halleck is a man. Why, however, every one asks, can we not keep
step with the Western people? It would have been delightful to me to be able to
converse with you on some points not belonging to the military portion of the
history of this war, but not the less important, perhaps far more important.
But it was not to be. Have you observed that I am attacked on the Habeas Corpus
topic? Mr. Binney informs me that he is going very shortly to publish his No.
II. on the suspension of the Habeas Corpus privilege. Many pamphlets have been
published against him. I do not know whether he wishes this to be known, but
the pamphlet will soon be out. My son Hamilton lost his left arm at Fort
Donelson; and you may have observed that General Halleck has nominated him aid
on his staff, with the rank of captain, for distinguished services in the
capture of Fort Donelson, in which he was twice wounded. . . .
. . . His bravery is very highly spoken of. Of course his
wound is not yet healed, but he does well. I have written to Mr. Childs to send
me, if he can, a copy of the article “Lieber” in the forthcoming volume of Dr.
Allibone's Dictionary. It contains a pretty full list of my works, for which
you inquire in your letter. As soon as I receive it, it will be sent to you.
The great question, what is to be done after we shall have taken possession of
the revolted portions of our country, must present itself daily more seriously
to the mind of the President, and to all his advisers. I have told my friend
Charles Sumner that I cannot agree with his first position; there is too much
State Rights Doctrine in it for me. But I am far from agreeing with those who
seem to think that a revolted State, after such a catastrophe, may Jump back
into the old state of things, like that famous old man, you will remember, who
. . . jumped into a bramble bush
And scratched out both his eyes;
And when he saw his eyes were out,
With all his might and main
He jumped into another bush,
And seratched them in again.
SOURCE: Thomas Sergeant Perry, Editor, The Life and
Letters of Francis Lieber, p. 326-8
No comments:
Post a Comment