NEW YORK, FIFTH AVENUE,
June 26, 1887.
Dear Brother: I have just returned from Saratoga
and Lake George, and am now arranging for Providence, R.I., where on the Fourth
of July there is to be inaugurated an equestrian statue of General Burnside. I
was always one of Burnside's personal friends, but after the battle of
Chattanooga or Missionary Ridge, and after I had forced my Army of the
Tennessee to march by land 450 miles in October, November, 1863, from Memphis
to Chattanooga, General Grant, finding the Fourth Corps General Gordon Granger —
moving too slow, called on me to go to his relief at Knoxville, which I did
effectually and conclusively. Burnside in Knoxville reporting to Mr. Lincoln
direct, treated his siege as a question of supplies, viz., that his supplies
would be exhausted about December 3d, when want would compel him to surrender.
I was therefore forced to march my already weary Army of the Tennessee near 136
miles in four days, or be held responsible for the terrible consequences of his
surrender. I forced my men at twenty-six miles a day, and when I got to
Knoxville I found inside a fine pen of cattle, and was invited to dine with
Burnside at a dinner with a roast turkey, tablecloth, knives, forks, and
spoons, which I had not seen for years. My Memoirs described the literal truth,
but Burnside's friends thought it hard on him, and now I shall go to the
dedication of his monument to apologize for telling the truth. Others may
orate, I will not. I will simply assert a personal friendship. Burnside was not
a combative man. He was kind, good, and patriotic, as you saw him in the
Senate, but he did not come up to the occasion. In war we must use all forces,
and now when we look back we recognize the qualities of each. Burnside was a
good man, but he was not a war soldier.
The New York papers make out that you and I differ. Of
course, we all differ. I stand by the authorities. . . . Mr. Cleveland is
President, so recognized by Congress, Supreme Court, and the world. Now, by the
Fifth Article of War, made the law before you were born, every officer of the
Army of the United States who speaks disrespectfully of the President of the
United States becomes a felon the same as one who has committed murder, felony,
forgery, treason, or any crime, and could be punished at the discretion of a
court-martial. I am still an officer of the army, and cannot violate this law.
Of course I know Drum, the Adjutant-General. He has no sympathy with the army
which fought. He was a non-combatant. He never captured a flag, and values it
only at its commercial value. He did not think of the blood and torture of
battle; nor can Endicott, the Secretary of War, or Mr. Cleveland. . . . Still,
in Republics majorities govern, and since only one in sixteen go to war,
non-combatants always govern. The soldier who fights must take a back seat and
apologize for his vehemence in action. Grant had to apologize, Sheridan to
shelter himself behind his most proper orders to devastate the Valley of the
Shenandoah, and Sherman to be abused and assailed for the accidental burning of
Columbia in the day of Republican rule. . . . In 1861-65 we fought for union
and right. The soldiers restored to Congress full power, and returned to their
civil vocations. Congress surrendered the country to the non-combatants, and
now it is questionable whether Lincoln or Jeff Davis was the Union man. Jeff
now says he never meant war. He thought that they would be allowed to do as
they pleased without war. Lincoln was the assailant, Davis only on the
"defensive-offensive."
SOURCE: Rachel Sherman Thorndike, Editor, The
Sherman Letters: Correspondence Between General and Senator Sherman from 1837
to 1891, p. 374-6