ST. LOUIS, Mo., Dec. 4,
1884.
Dear Brother: . . . We have several posts of the Grand Army
here, one of which, Frank Blair Post No 1, invited me to assist in the
dedication of their new hall. I could not well decline, and attended. The hall
was well filled, but it is against the customs and rules for reporters to be
present. I saw none, but there must have been two at least who reported what
little I had to say differently. Still my speech was most imperfect and
condensed, emphasizing what I said of Jeff Davis, and induced somewhat by the
regular speaker of the evening, who preceded me.
I congratulated them upon having secured so good a hall in
so good a neighborhood; said that I was glad to see the interest manifested;
that it was well for old soldiers thus to meet to interchange the memories of
the war, and to impress its lessons on the rising generation; that I noticed a
tendency to gloss over the old names and facts; that it was not a war among the
States," a war of "secession," but a "conspiracy" up
to the firing on Sumter, and a "Rebellion" afterwards; that, whilst
in Louisiana long before Mr. Lincoln was inaugurated, I saw evidences of the
"conspiracy," among them the letter written in January by Slidell and
Benjamin, then United States Senators under the oath, written on paper dated
"United States Senate," etc., addressed to T. O. Moore, Governor of
Louisiana, to seize the United States Arsenal at Baton Rouge; that afterwards,
during the progress of the war, I had seen letters of Mr. Davis—a chest full at
Jackson, Miss., sent to Washington—proving such "conspiracy," and
subsequently I had seen a letter of Mr. Davis showing that he was not sincere
in his doctrine of secession, for when some of the States of the Confederacy,
in 1865, talked of "separate State action," another name for "secession,"
he, as President of the Confederacy, would resist it, even if he had to turn
Lee's army against it. I did see such a letter, or its copy, in a captured
letter-book at Raleigh, just about as the war was closing.
Mr. Davis, in a card addressed to the "Republican1"
of this city, published by it and generally copied, pronounced this false,
calls on me to produce the identical letter, or to stand convicted of being a
slanderer. Of course I cannot for an instant allow Mr. Davis to call on me for
any specific document, or to enter up judgment on the statement of a newspaper.
Still, I believe the truth of my statement can be established. I will not
answer Mr. Davis direct, nor will I publish anything over my signature, but I
will collect evidence to make good my statement. The particular letter shown me
at Raleigh may be in the public archives at Washington, as I am sure that the
box or chest was sent from Jackson, Miss.; but I apprehend that the papers
gathered at Fayetteville, Raleigh, and Chapel Hill University were of those
taken in hand by my two adjutants, Generals Sawyer and Rochester, brought to
St. Louis, assorted and arranged as part of the records of the "Division
of the Missouri," and sent to Chicago at the time General Sheridan
relieved me. These records were consumed in the great fire of Chicago, 1871,
but of the existence of such a letter I have not a particle of doubt. Of course
I cannot recall the words, but the general purport was such as to recall to my
mind the old fable of the Farmer and the Ox: "It makes all the difference
in the world whether your bull gores my ox or mine yours."
I have made some inquiries of Col. R. N. Scott, in charge of
the Rebellion Records, Union and Confederate, and if the correspondence between
Mr. Davis and the State Governors is among these records, Mr. Davis will have
his letter. I am not the custodian of the records of the war, which fill many
buildings in Washington. As to Davis' opinions at that date, January and
February, 1865, I can, I think, obtain secondary proof, being promised an
original letter from Thad. Stevens2 to Herschel V. Johnson, captured
and still retained by a sergeant in the Union Army.
As to the "conspiracy," the proof is overwhelming.
As to Davis' opinions in the winter of 1864-65, I am equally satisfied, but may
not be able to prove by his own handwriting. . . .
Affectionately yours,
W. T. SHERMAN.
_______________
1 Newspaper.
2 See following letter.
SOURCE: Rachel Sherman Thorndike, Editor, The
Sherman Letters: Correspondence Between General and Senator Sherman from 1837
to 1891, p. 362-5