New Orleans, February 5th, 1863.
Dear Sir: The
steamer did not leave yesterday as was expected, and now I can reply to your
letter with less hesitation.
I choose the office of “Commissioner of Internal Revenue” as
it is termed in your letter, and will assume the duties thereof whenever you
direct. I suppose it to be an office requiring my constant presence here, and
whatever its duties may be, I can discharge them to your satisfaction. Full
instructions and all printed information will, of course, be supplied to me.
I sent to you Gen. Banks' order respecting trade as soon as
it was issued, and regret you did not receive it. You are mistaken in supposing
it contemplates trade with the enemy—of any kind or degree. Gen. Banks is
utterly opposed to any such proceeding. The General's English is not always
good and his orders not always clear.
Do not think from my letter about Dr. Zachary, that I
intended to cast suspicion on Gen. Banks, who is not only a kind and pleasant
gentleman, but also, I am satisfied, a thoroughly honest man. Dr Zachary
applied to me an hour ago, for another of his Israelite friends to take a large
stock of goods to Donaldsonville. The reason given is the same as before—that
the Dr. wants his friends' cooperation, which would be imperfect unless said
friend pretends to be selling goods. I don't believe a word of it. The Doctor
pretends to be my best friend, but I think him a humbug.
I sent him to the General for an order and he has not yet
returned.
Notwithstanding my personal regard for Gen. Banks, I repeat
the conviction so often expressed before, that he is not the man for this
important place. Gen. Butler is the only man who is equal to the situation, and
he ought to come back.
I kept you well informed about Gen. Butler while he was
here, and you know whatever wrong things were done by him. Four fifths of the
accusations against him are false.
I shall do everything in my power to help Mr. Bullitt when
he assumes the duties of the office.
SOURCE: Diary and correspondence of Salmon P. Chase, Annual
Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1902, Vol.
2, p. 355-6
No comments:
Post a Comment