I trouble you with a
line on the subject of our affairs, hoping that you may be able to communicate
the substance to some person or persons having influence with the U. S. Govmt.—
In the first place — allow me to say I have no cause of complaint against
President Lincoln's Proclamation as a War Measure. All Goverments
must possess the right & the power of self-preservation, — & to use all
means & measures calculated to secure this end. The President, therefore,
had the right to proclaim freedom to the slaves — if he deemed the exercise of
the right necessary & essential to the suppression of the Rebellion — but —
I think there is just ground of complaint against
its indiscriminate application to friends as
well as enemies & it is unfortuneately too true that its
injurious effects are felt certainly by three friends (& probably
five) where two enemies suffer. This is hard because
the friends were powerless against the numbers opposed to
them. It is further hard — because the Confiscation Act is less [incessing?]
in its destruction. It discriminates, & only
operates on those found in actual rebellion with officers or soldiers in the
Rebel ranks or those holding civil offices under the Rebel Govmt.
If possible — this great grievance should be remedied.
It furnishes a strong argument against the U. S. Govmt —
which the secessionists do not fail to use, — & use freely. Why would not
the President allow the Army officers commanding districts — to exercise a
sound discretion in bringing the Proclamation to bear on the inhabitants of
their respective districts? But again — there is a strong & daily
increasing desire to return to the Union, — under a pledge to the adoption of a
gradual system of emancipation. Efforts are now making to bring this about.—
Already the converts are numerous — very numerous, & among those — too —
most actively engaged on the secession side. All that is now wanting to give
success to this movement is some official assurance that the rights of property
holders (of any description) will be recognized on our return to the Union with
the pledge on our part that immediately thereon a system of gradual
emancipation shall be adopted by our State Legislature — on just &
equitable terms (without compensation in money, but liberal terms as to time.)
Can the Govmt ask more than this? Could the people of the
Northern & Western States desire more? Would it not be infinitely (& to
all intents & purposes) better for them than Emancipation under the
Proclamation? The people of the U. S. Govmt cannot be
benefitted by the total & sudden prostration of our productive powers! by
the extinction of our entire prosperity. If we are to live again under one
Union & one Govmt — we must live in
mutual dependence on each other. Taxes for the payment of the Govmt
debt cannot be collected from a people utterly ruined. The sudden
emancipation of our slaves would so reduce the value of the lands — that the
fee simple would not sell for as much as could & would be
collected from the people when in the enjoyment of their rights as
slaveholders. But — is it not important to bring back as speedily as possible
the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, & Tennessee? How
long after would it be before Alabama, Georgia, Florida, & North Carolina
would follow the example? I cannot think otherwise than that the Govmt
of the U. S. ought at once (& without a months delay) to invite the
people of these States to return to the Union. It wants but some assurance
that they will be treated as the Prodigal Son (so beautifully illustrated in
the Scriptures) & they will gladly manifest their
penitence if they can be assured that their acknowledgment will not be spurned
& scorned: (signed) Stephen Duncan.
SOURCE: Papers of Abraham Lincoln at
the Library of Congress, Accessed October 27, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment