Showing posts with label Ft Craig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ft Craig. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

A Battle near Fort Craig

DENVER CITY, March 8.

By military express the following news was received here to-day:

A desperate and terrible battle, lasting all day, took place at Valverne [sic], ten miles south of Fort Craig on the 21st.

The loss great on both sides.  Both parties claim the victory.

Fight probably renewed on the 22d.

A regiment of Mexicans ran away.  It was commanded by Col. Panon.  He started first, and his entire command followed.

Capt. McKea, who had charge of the artillery, and every one of his command were killed at their post.  The cannon was taken by the enemy.  Kit Carson was within 15 miles of Fort Craig.  Firing was heard from his direction.  It is not known what was the result of this fight.

– Published in The Davenport Daily Gazette, Davenport, Iowa, Monday Morning, March 10, 1862, p. 1

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Later from New Mexico

KANSAS CITY, May 19. – The Santa Fe mail dates of the 3d have arrived.

The Texans while retreating met a body of 500 of their own men under Col. Steele at Adobe Walbut and the whole force continued their retreat.

The First regiment Colorado Volunteers with the regulars, are at Fort Craig, under command of Col. Paul.

Gen. Canby and Governor Connelly are at Santa Fe.

Owing to the scarcity of provisions, large quantities of which were destroyed, to prevent their falling into the hands of the enemy, our troops have been placed on less than half rations, being limited to eight ounces per day.

One hundred and twenty Texan prisoners were passed on the road to Ft. Learned.

– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye, Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, May 24, 1862, p. 4

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

From New Mexico

CANSAS CITY, May 10. – The Santa Fe mail has arrived with advices from Fort Craig to the 23d of April.  Gen. Canby was at that place with his command.  It was presumed he would soon move forward to Messailla.

The Texans on their retreat down the river abandoned 35 of their wagons and buried some of their guns.  When they crossed the Purcio river at its junction with the Rio Grande, they then separated into small parties and fled to the mountains abandoning their sick and those who could not travel at the requisite speed.

It is thought that the enemy will not make another stand in the Territory, but endeavor to get home.

One hundred wagons of provisions that had been collected at Santa Fe, were sent to Fort Union on the 23rd.

– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye, Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, May 17, 1862, p. 3

Thursday, May 27, 2010

From Leavenworth

LEAVENWORTH, Feb. 10.

By general order No. 17, Gen. Hunter declares martial law throughout the State of Kansas, and declares the crime of jayhawking shall be put down with a strong and summary process.

Jos. Holmes, Secretary of New Mexico, eleven and a half days from Santa Fe, brings important dispatches to Gen. Hunter, and information regarding affairs in the Territory.

The rebel Brigadier-Gen., H. H. Sibley, was within 30 miles of Ft. Craig, with 2,000 Texans with artillery, and had issued a buncombe proclamation.

Col. Canby has taken active measures to oppose him, and feels able to make a successful resistance.

It is reported that a considerable force of Texans are advancing up Rio Pecos to attack Fort Union.

An express has been sent to Denver City for reinforcements, and the Colorado Troops would probably march immediately.

Martial law was proclaimed in the territory, and all the able bodied men were being drafted to serve in the militia. All the mules, horses, and ammunition in the territory have been seized for used of the government.

The Indians in territory reported troublesome.

– Published in The Davenport Daily Gazette, Davenport, Iowa, Tuesday Morning, February 11, 1862, p. 1

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The War in New Mexico – An Incident

The Government is so occupied in striking at the heart of rebellion in the seceded States, that it has not given that attention to the territory of New Mexico which, under other circumstances, it would have received. The consequence has been that the few troops stationed there have had to contend against a superior force of the most daring rebels that are engaged in the effort to subvert the Government. Hordes of these scoundrels, inured to privations that admirably fit them for camp life, have swarmed up from Texas, and, led by daring men, have boldly attacked our troops and driven them back, step by step, until they have nearly reached Fort Union on the North. Kit Carson still remains at Fort Craig, some three hundred miles south, but having only seven hundred men at his command. A vigorous onslaught of the enemy in force, would drive that bold man from his position or oblige him to surrender.

Had Wm. Gilpin, ex-Governor of Colorado territory, instead of holding the regiments he organized in the gold mines, for months in idleness, sent them to the succor of the troops in New Mexico, this state of affairs might have been prevented. In no portion of the Union have our troops contended with greater bravery then in New Mexico, but owing to their location and comparative insignificance of numbers, and the public mind being engrossed in scenes nearer home, very little attention has been given to the struggle of these brave men, to prevent the inroads of the rebels.

A little incident was narrated us a few evenings since by Judge Hubbell, of Albuquerque, that shows the fierceness with which both parties fight. – Although it may have been in print, the particulars have not been given with that minuteness to which so fierce recontre is entitled. A company of one hundred mounted Texans attacked a force of eighty-five of our men engaged in guarding a battery. The former went in, as they boasted, with the determination of “cleaning out the d----d Yankees and showing them another Bull Run on a smaller scale.” At the first fire our men emptied fifty-seven saddles! The balance of the Texans, no way disconcerted, hastily dismounted, and with a bowie knife strapped to each mans wrist and a revolver in each and, rushed upon the loyal troops. The latter gave way not an inch, but with bayonet fixed advanced into the charge. Then followed the most terrible had-to-hand fight recorded in this war. Both parties fought for life, and with a determination unequalled. We know not who long the struggle lasted, but when it ceased only five of the brave but misguided Texans remained alive, and but eight of the Federal troops were left to boast of the victory they had so terribly achieved.

With so many troops at its command our Government should not allow the brave loyalists of New Mexico to be driven from their homes, and the few Federal regiments stationed there to be cut to pieces by these Texan banditti. Without delay sufficient force should be sent thither to drive back the rebels and recover the property of our loyal citizens that has been seized upon an confiscated by the rebels. In no event should those noble men, Col. Canby and Kit Carson, be sacrificed upon the unholy altar of rebellion. They should be rescued immediately from the perilous position they now occupy.

– Published in The Davenport Daily Gazette, Davenport, Iowa, Saturday Morning, April 26, 1862, p. 2

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

From New Mexico

(Correspondence of M. Republican)

FT. UNION, NEW MEXICO, April 13. – Colonel Slough, after the battle of [Apache Canyon], fell back and took position at Bernal Springs, 45 miles south of Fort Union. This was deemed the strategetical [sic] point, being within supporting distance of Ft. Union, and in a position to harass the enemy, and to form a junction with Col. Canby when he shall leave Ft. Craig, 200 miles south. We had been there one day, when Col. Canby sent from Fort Craig, his Assistant Ad’jt General, with preemptory orders to Col. Slough to fall back with his column to Ft. Union, which was immediately observed.

It would seem that we crippled the enemy in the Apache [Canyon] more than was believed at first. We have reliable information that we killed over 100 men, including 6 officers, and wounded over 200.

We have now prisoners at Ft. Union 21 officers and 82 privates.

The enemy fell back to Santa Fe and are again, it is believed, concentrating in their old position at Albuquerque.

Yesterday an express arrived from Colonel [Canby], stating that he would leave Ft. Craig on the 31st of March.

If the enemy is still in the vicinity of [Albuquerque], with ordinary traveling Col. Canby is in their immediate vicinity and his column 180 miles from [Albuquerque] will only leave this morning. He will be unsupported by this column, and with 900 regulars will have to encounter their forces unless he can slip by and join the column which leaves here this morning.

It is understood that Kit Carson with a regiment of New Mexican volunteers, 700 strong will remain and garrison Fort Craig. It is rumored that Colonels Stute and Busler of the rebel army are advancing into New [Mexico] with 800 additional men.

Important events will probably occur before the next Express leaves for the States.

A well authenticated report has since reached here that the Texan forces, 2,000 strong, are entrenching themselves at Santa Fe. Colonel Canby having strengthened his command up to 1200 is fifty miles south of Santa Fe. This may enable our two commands to act together, and make us 2400. If this is the case we will have one of the bloodiest battles of record.

The enemy’s artillery numbers about 18 Pieces, ours 12 pieces.

– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye, Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, April 26, 1862, p. 3

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Handsome Victory in New Mexico

{Correspondence of the Missouri Republican.}

APACHE GLEN, NEW MEXICO,
BETWEEN SANTA FE AND FT. UNION, March 30.

Since I wrote you Col. Slough’s column, 1,300 strong, have advanced to Hegan’s Ranch, 25 miles north of Santa Fe, where they encountered the enemy – strength not known – and immediately engaged them. Maj. Crittenden, 1st Colorado volunteers and two companies U. S. infantry, under Capt. Lewis, were sent across the Moir to fall upon their rear. Col. Slough, according to programme, gave way gradually, which left the supply train of the rebels unsupported, which Maj. Crittenden and Capt. Lewis easily captured, together with about fifty loaded wagons, which were burned, and twenty prisoners and one 2-pound howitzer taken from us at Fort Craig, which was spiked by our troops.

Col. Slough who commanded them fell back to a strong position. Our trophies are 100 prisoners; privates and officers; 50 loaded wagons burned; one piece of artillery of the enemy spiked, from 100 to 200 killed and wounded, one major, two captains, &c. Our loss is about 18 or 20 killed including Lieut. Baker of Colorado volunteers, and 30 or 40 wounded.

It is supposed the rebel Gen. Sibley will advance upon Col. Slough’s column with his entire force, from 2 to 3,000 strong, and that Col. Slough will fall back upon the trenches at Depot Union.

At last accounts Col. Canby had not left Fort Craig. With Col. Slough’s command it is believed he can hold Fort Union against any force the rebels can bring against it.

The whole command engaged on our side behaved with signal gallantry and coolness, both volunteers and regulars.

P. S. – March 31. – 95 prisoners with 11 officers of the rebel army have just passed under an escort and will arrive at Fort Union to-night or early in the morning.

Col. Slough’s entire command has fallen back to Bencal Springs, 44 miles from Fort Union, and within supporting distance.

– Published in The Davenport Daily Gazette, Davenport, Iowa, Saturday Morning, April 19, 1862, p. 1

Monday, September 21, 2009

Fall of Fort Craig

It will be recollected that after the late battle between Gen. Sibley’s forces and Col. Canby’s in New Mexico that Canby’s forces, the Federals, retreated to Fort Craig, and were surrounded by our troops. The New Orleans papers of the 1st inst. state that authentic news from San Antonio, affirms the surrender of the Fort. The surrender was unconditional. The Confederates are therefore the masters of New Mexico.

– Published in The North Carolina Weekly Standard, Raleigh, North Carolina, Wednesday, April 16, 1862, p. 1