Showing posts with label Gettysburg Address. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gettysburg Address. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Review: Three Roads to Gettysburg

Three Roads to Gettysburg: Meade, Lee, Lincoln, and theBattle That Changed the War, the Speech That Changed the Nation

By Tim McGrath

It is estimated that between 60,000 and 100,000 books related to the American Civil War have been published since 1865, with approximately 30,000 devoted to the Gettysburg Campaign and Battle of Gettysburg. Depending on which estimates one accepts, that means that somewhere between 30 and 50 percent of the enormous literature of the Civil War has focused, at least in part, on Gettysburg. With numbers like these, one might reasonably ask: Is there really a need for another book about Gettysburg?

Tim McGrath’s Three Roads to Gettysburg provides a compelling answer to that question—not by uncovering some previously unknown story of the battle, but by finding a different way to tell a familiar one.

Many people, justly or unjustly, point to Gettysburg as the turning point of the Civil War. But how did the war arrive at that pivotal moment? The events of July 1–3, 1863, did not occur in isolation. They were the product of years of political, military, and personal developments involving thousands of individuals. A comprehensive accounting of all the events and personalities that laid the foundation for Gettysburg would be virtually impossible in a single volume. McGrath simplifies that daunting task by selecting three men whose lives and decisions became intimately connected with the battle and its aftermath: Union Major General George Gordon Meade, Confederate General Robert E. Lee, and President Abraham Lincoln.

These three "roads" form the structure of McGrath’s narrative. He follows Meade, Lee, and Lincoln from their early lives through the events that ultimately brought two of them together on the Gettysburg battlefield and placed the third in the position of interpreting the battle's meaning for a divided nation. Along the way, McGrath demonstrates how seemingly separate lives can gradually converge at a single moment in history.

For Meade and Lee, McGrath begins with their early years and education at West Point, follows their military assignments and service during the Mexican-American War, and then traces their careers through the turbulent 1850s and the outbreak of the Civil War. Their military careers unfold against the growing sectional crisis and, eventually, the war itself. The two men ultimately find themselves commanding opposing armies on the fields around Gettysburg.

Lincoln’s road is different, but equally important. McGrath follows him from his humble beginnings near Hodgenville, Kentucky, and his formative years in Indiana, through his experiences in New Orleans and New Salem, Illinois, and into Illinois politics and the United States Congress. From these modest beginnings, Lincoln eventually reaches the presidency at the moment when the nation is torn apart by civil war. His road to Gettysburg culminates not as a battlefield commander but as the nation's chief executive and, ultimately, as the author of the Gettysburg Address.

McGrath’s narrative is essentially linear, alternating among his three principal subjects and giving each his turn as their lives move through the twists and turns of history. This approach allows the reader to watch the three roads gradually converge on the small Pennsylvania town of Gettysburg. The contrast between the scale of the events and the size of the town is striking. Approximately 160,000 soldiers would eventually participate in the battle, while Gettysburg itself was home to only about 2,400 people.

Once the armies arrive at Gettysburg, however, the limitations of a three-man biography become apparent. The lives of Meade and Lee alone cannot provide everything necessary to explain the complicated events of July 1–3, 1863. McGrath therefore expands his narrative, introducing the experiences and perspectives of numerous other participants. This allows him to move beyond the three principal biographies and provide the reader with a broader understanding of the battle itself.

The approach works particularly well for readers who may know the broad outlines of Gettysburg but lack a detailed understanding of how the battle unfolded. Rather than becoming overwhelmed by the enormous cast of characters associated with Gettysburg, the reader is given three central figures through whom the larger story can be understood.

The book does not end with the Confederate retreat from Gettysburg. Its final chapters turn to Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and then provide a broad overview of the remaining two years of the war, from Gettysburg through Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House. McGrath follows Lee into the postwar years and his presidency of what became Washington and Lee University, examines Lincoln’s assassination, revisits the postwar relationship between Meade and Major General Daniel E. Sickles, and concludes with the deaths of Lee and Meade.

This structure reinforces one of the book's central themes: Gettysburg was not an isolated event but a moment in the lives of three men whose stories continued long after the guns fell silent. The battle itself occupies only a few days, but the roads that brought Meade, Lee, and Lincoln there—and the consequences of what happened there—extend across decades.

So, to return to the original question: Is there really a need for another book about Gettysburg?

This is not a book written for scholars of the American Civil War or specialists in the Gettysburg Campaign. Nor does it attempt to replace the numerous detailed studies that have examined the battle from virtually every conceivable angle. It was not designed to do so. McGrath’s intended audience is the general reader of history with an interest in the Civil War, particularly those with limited knowledge of the war and Gettysburg, as well as readers looking for an accessible refresher on one of the most studied battles in American history.

For that audience, Three Roads to Gettysburg offers a distinctive approach. It is a well-researched and accessible narrative presented as a single-volume triple biography. Rather than asking the reader to absorb the enormous cast of characters and events surrounding Gettysburg all at once, McGrath uses the lives of Meade, Lee, and Lincoln as three guideposts through the complicated history that led to the battle and its aftermath.

There will almost certainly always be new books about Gettysburg. Some will be massive, highly detailed studies devoted to the minutiae of the campaign, the battlefield, individual units, commanders, soldiers, civilians, or particular moments of the fighting. Others, like Three Roads to Gettysburg, will provide broader narratives for readers who are new to the subject or simply want to revisit the story without wading through hundreds of pages of specialized scholarship.

And perhaps that is the best answer to the question of whether another Gettysburg book is necessary. There is always room for another telling of an important story when it finds a new audience or presents that story in an accessible way. Gettysburg has been studied for more than 160 years, yet each generation produces new readers encountering the Civil War for the first time. For those readers, the story still needs to be told—and McGrath has chosen three remarkable roads by which to tell it.

ISBN 978-0593184394, Dutton, © 2025, Hardcover, 528 Pages, Maps, End Notes, Bibliography & Index. $38.00.  To Purchase the book click HERE.


Friday, August 16, 2019

In The Review Queue: Lincoln's Gettysburg Address


By A. E. Elmore

While it has long been determined that Abraham Lincoln’s writings were influenced by the King James Bible, until now no full-length study has shown the precise ways in which the Gettysburg Address uses its specific language. Refuting the view that the address was crafted with traditional classical references, this revealing investigation provides a new way to think about the speech and the man who wrote it. A. E. Elmore offers chapter and verse evidence from the Bible as well as specific examples from the Episcopal Book of Common Prayer to illustrate how Lincoln borrowed from these sources to imbue his speech with meanings that would resonate with his listeners. He cites every significant word and phrase—conceived, brought forth, struggled, remaining, consecrate, dedicate, hallow, devotion, new birth, to name a few—borrowed by Lincoln from these two religious texts for use in his dedication of the Gettysburg National Cemetery.

 Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address focuses on a number of overlooked themes and ideas, such as the importance of literary allusion and the general public’s knowledge of the Bible in the age of Lincoln. It provides fresh answers to old questions and poses new questions: Was Lincoln a common thief who made use of words from previously published materials as well as from works by his contemporaries? Was he a genius whose literary and political skills were unmatched? No one who reads this highly engaging study will ever think about Lincoln or the Gettysburg Address the same way again.

About the Author

A former trial lawyer and professor of law and literature, A. E. Elmore (1938–2016) contributed essays to a number of books, including American Fiction: Form and Function and The Vanderbilt Tradition, among others.

ISBN 978-0809335602, Southern Illinois University Press, © 2017, Paperback, 280 pages, End Notes, Works Cited & Index. $22.50.  To purchase this book click HERE.

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

In The Review Queue: The Long Shadow of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address


By Jared Peatman

When Abraham Lincoln addressed the crowd at the new national cemetery in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 19, 1863, he intended his speech to be his most eloquent statement on the inextricable link between equality and democracy. However, unwilling to commit to equality at that time, the nation stood ill-prepared to accept the full message of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. In the ensuing century, groups wishing to advance a particular position hijacked Lincoln’s words for their own ends, highlighting the specific parts of the speech that echoed their stance while ignoring the rest. Only as the nation slowly moved toward equality did those invoking Lincoln’s speech come closer to recovering his true purpose. In this incisive work, Jared Peatman seeks to understand Lincoln’s intentions at Gettysburg and how his words were received, invoked, and interpreted over time, providing a timely and insightful analysis of one of America’s most legendary orations.

After reviewing the events leading up to November 19, 1863, Peatman examines immediate responses to the ceremony in New York, Gettysburg itself, Confederate Richmond, and London, showing how parochial concerns and political affiliations shaped initial coverage of the day and led to the censoring of Lincoln’s words in some locales.  He then traces how, over time, proponents of certain ideals invoked the particular parts of the address that suited their message, from reunification early in the twentieth century to American democracy and patriotism during the world wars and, finally, to Lincoln’s full intended message of equality during the Civil War centennial commemorations and the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Peatman also explores foreign invocations of the Gettysburg Address and its influence on both the Chinese constitution of 1912 and the current French constitution. An epilogue highlights recent and even current applications of the Gettysburg Address and hints at ways the speech might be used in the future.
By tracing the evolution of Lincoln’s brief words at a cemetery dedication into a revered document essential to American national identity, this revealing work provides fresh insight into the enduring legacy of Abraham Lincoln and his Gettysburg Address on American history and culture.

About the Author

Jared Peatman is a leadership development consultant and the director of curriculum for the Lincoln Leadership Institute at Gettysburg.

ISBN 978-0809333103, Southern Illinois University Press, © 2013, Hardcover, 264 Pages, Photographs & Illustrations, End Notes, Bibliography & Index. $34.50.  To Purchase the book click HERE.

Friday, July 26, 2019

In The Review Queue: The Long Shadow of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address

The Long Shadow of

By Jared Peatman

When Abraham Lincoln addressed the crowd at the new national cemetery in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 19, 1863, he intended his speech to be his most eloquent statement on the inextricable link between equality and democracy. However, unwilling to commit to equality at that time, the nation stood ill-prepared to accept the full message of Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. In the ensuing century, groups wishing to advance a particular position hijacked Lincoln’s words for their own ends, highlighting the specific parts of the speech that echoed their stance while ignoring the rest. Only as the nation slowly moved toward equality did those invoking Lincoln’s speech come closer to recovering his true purpose. In this incisive work, Jared Peatman seeks to understand Lincoln’s intentions at Gettysburg and how his words were received, invoked, and interpreted over time, providing a timely and insightful analysis of one of America’s most legendary orations.

After reviewing the events leading up to November 19, 1863, Peatman examines immediate responses to the ceremony in New York, Gettysburg itself, Confederate Richmond, and London, showing how parochial concerns and political affiliations shaped initial coverage of the day and led to the censoring of Lincoln’s words in some locales.  He then traces how, over time, proponents of certain ideals invoked the particular parts of the address that suited their message, from reunification early in the twentieth century to American democracy and patriotism during the world wars and, finally, to Lincoln’s full intended message of equality during the Civil War centennial commemorations and the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Peatman also explores foreign invocations of the Gettysburg Address and its influence on both the Chinese constitution of 1912 and the current French constitution. An epilogue highlights recent and even current applications of the Gettysburg Address and hints at ways the speech might be used in the future.

By tracing the evolution of Lincoln’s brief words at a cemetery dedication into a revered document essential to American national identity, this revealing work provides fresh insight into the enduring legacy of Abraham Lincoln and his Gettysburg Address on American history and culture.

About the Author

Jared Peatman is a leadership development consultant and the director of curriculum for the Lincoln Leadership Institute at Gettysburg.

ISBN 978-0809333103, Southern Illinois University Press, © 2013, Hardcover, 264 pages, Photographs & Illustrations, End Notes, Bibliography & Index. $34.50.  To purchase this book click HERE.

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Diary of John Hay: November 19, 1863

Nov. 18 we started from Washington to go to the consecration of the Soldiers’ Cemetery at Gettysburg. On our train were the President, Seward, Usher and Blair; Nicolay and myself; Mercier and Admiral Reynaud; Bertinatti and Capt Isola, and Lt Martinez and Cora; Mrs. Wise; Wayne MacVeagh; McDougal of Canada; and one or two others. We had a pleasant sort of a trip. At Baltimore Schenck’s staff joined us.

Just before we arrived at Gettysburg, the President got into a little talk with McVeagh about Missouri affairs. MacV. talked radicalism until he learned that he was talking recklessly. The President disavowed any knowledge of the Edwards case; said that Bates said to him, as indeed he said to me, that Edwards was inefficient and must be removed for that reason.

At Gettysburg the President went to Mr. Wills who expected him, and our party broke like a drop of quicksilver spilt. MacVeagh, young Stanton and I foraged around for a while — walked out to the College, got a chafing dish of oysters, then some supper, and, finally, loafing around to the Court House where Lamon was holding a  meeting of marshals, we found Forney, and went around to his place, Mr. Fahnestock’s, and drank a little whiskey with him. He had been drinking a good deal during the day, and was getting to feel a little ugly and dangerous. He was particularly bitter on Montgomery Blair. MacVeagh was telling him that he pitched into the Tycoon coming up, and told him some truths. He said the President got a good deal of that, from time to time, and needed it.

He says: — “Hay, you are a fortunate man. You have kept yourself aloof from your office. 
I know an old fellow now seventy, who was Private Secretary to Madison. He thought there was something solemn and memorable in it. Hay has laughed through his term.”


He talked very strangely, referring to the affectionate and loyal support which he and Curtin had given to the President in Pennsylvania, with references from himself and others to the favors that had been shown the Cameron party whom they regard as their natural enemies. Forney seems identified now fully with the Curtain interest, though, when Curtin was nominated, he called him a heavy weight to carry, and said that Cameron’s foolish attack nominated him.

We went out after a while following the music to hear the serenades. The President appeared at the door, said half a dozen words meaning nothing, and went in. Seward, who was staying around the corner at Harper’s was called out, and spoke so indistinctly that I did not hear a word of what he was saying. Forney and MacVeagh were still growling about Blair.

We went back to Forney's room, having picked up Nicolay, and drank more whiskey. Nicolay sang his little song of the “Three Thieves,” and we then sang John Brown. At last we proposed that Forney should make a speech, and two or three started out, Stanton and Behan and Nicolay, to get a band to serenade him. I staid with him; so did Stanton and MacVeagh. He still growled quietly, and I thought he was going to do some thing imprudent. He said, “if I speak, I will speak my mind.” The music sounded in the street, and the fuglers came rushing up, imploring him to come down. He smiled quietly, told them to keep cool, and asked, “are the recorders there?” “I suppose so, of course,” shouted up the fugler. “Ascertain!” said the imperturbable Forney: “Hay, we'll take a drink.” They shouted and begged him to come down. The thing would be a failure; it would be his fault, etc. “Are the recorders congenial?” he calmly insisted on knowing. Somebody commended prudence. He said sternly, “I am always prudent.” I walked down stairs with him.

The crowd was large and clamorous. The fuglers stood by the door in an agony. The reporters squatted at a little stand in the entry. Forney stood on the threshold, John Young and I by him. The crowd shouted as the door opened. Forney said; “My friends these are the first hearty cheers I have heard to-night. You gave no such cheers to your President down the street. Do you know what you owe to that great man? You owe your country — you owe your name as American Citizens.”

He went on blackguarding the crowd for their apathy, and then diverged to his own record, saying he had been for Lincoln in his heart in 1860, — that open advocacy was not as effectual as the course he took — dividing the most corrupt organisation that ever existed — the pro-slavery Democratic party. He dwelt at length on this question, and then went back to the Eulogy of the President, that great, wonderful, mysterious, inexplicable man, who holds in his single hands the reins of the republic; who keeps his own counsels; who does his own purpose in his own way, no matter what temporising minister in his Cabinet sets himself up in opposition to the progress of the age.

And very much of this.

After him Wayne MacVeagh made a most touching and beautiful spurt of five minutes, and Judge Shannon of Pittsburg spoke effectively and acceptably to the people.

“That speech must not be written out yet,” says Young. “He will see further about it when he gets sober,” as we went up stairs. We sang John Brown and went home.

In the morning I got a beast and rode out with the President and suite to the Cemetery in the procession. The procession formed itself in an orphanly sort of way, and moved out with very little help from anybody; and after a little delay Mr. Everett took his place on the stand, — and Mr. Stockton made a prayer which thought it was an oration — and Mr. Everett spoke as he always does, perfectly; and the President, in a firm, free way, with more grace than is his wont, said his half dozen lines of consecration, — and the music wailed, and we went home through crowded and cheering streets. And all the particulars are in the daily papers.

I met Genl Cameron after coming in and he, MacVeagh and I, went down to dinner on board the U. C. R. R. Car. I was more than usually struck by the intimate jovial relations that exist between men that hate and detest each other as cordially as do those Pennsylvania politicians.

We came home the night of the 19th.

SOURCES: Clara B. Hay, Letters of John Hay and Extracts from Diary, Volume 1, p. 120-5; For the whole diary entry see Tyler Dennett, Editor, Lincoln and the Civil War in the Diaries and letters of John Hay, p. 119-22.