Vicksburg, Mississippi,
August 30, 1863.
YOUR letter of the 8th of August, inclosing one from Senator
Wilson8 to you, reached here during my temporary absence to the
northern part of my command; hence my apparent delay in answering. I fully
appreciate all Senator Wilson says. Had it not been for General Halleck and
Dana,9 I think it altogether likely I would have been ordered to the
Potomac. My going could do no possible good. They have there able officers who
have been brought up with that army, and to import a commander to place over
them certainly could produce no good. While I would not positively disobey an
order, I would have objected most vehemently to taking that command or any
other, except the one I have. I can do more with this army than it would be
possible for me to do with any other without time to make the same acquaintance
with others I have with this. I know that the soldiers of the Army of the
Tennessee can be relied on to the fullest extent. I believe I know the exact
capacity of every general in my command to lead troops, and just where to place
them to get from them their best services. This is a matter of no small
importance. . . .
The people of the North need not quarrel over the
institution of slavery. What Vice-President Stephens acknowledges the
cornerstone of the Confederacy is already knocked out. Slavery is already dead,
and cannot be resurrected. It would take a standing army to maintain slavery in
the South if we were to make peace to-day, guaranteeing to the South all their
former constitutional privileges. I never was an abolitionist, not even what
could be called antislavery, but I try to judge fairly and honestly, and it
became patent to my mind early in the rebellion that the North and South could
never live at peace with each other except as one nation, and that without
slavery. As anxious as I am to see peace reestablished, I would not, therefore,
be willing to see any settlement until this question is forever settled.
Rawlins and Maltby10 have been appointed brigadier-generals. These
are richly deserved promotions. Rawlins especially is no ordinary man. The fact
is, had he started in this war in the line instead of in the staff, there is
every probability he would be to-day one of our shining lights. As it is, he is
better and more favorably known than probably any other officer in the army who
has filled only staff appointments. Some men, too many of them, are only made
by their staff appointments, while others give respectability to the position.
Rawlins is of the latter class. My kind regards to the citizens of Galena.
__________
8Henry Wilson of Massachusetts (1812-1875), who
in 1872 was elected Vice-President of the United States on the ticket with
General Grant.
9Charles A. Dana (1819-1897), Assistant Secretary
of War, and late editor of the New York Sun.
10Jasper A. Maltby (1826-1867), lieutenant
colonel Forty-fifth Illinois Infantry, August, 1861; colonel, November 29,
1862, and brigadier general, August 4, 1863.
SOURCES: James Grant Wilson, Editor, General Grant’s
Letters to a Friend 1861-1880, p. 27-9, 115; James H. Wilson, The Life of John A. Rawlins, p. 434