The Washington correspondent of the New York Tribune relates
the following:
A clerk in one of the Departments in Washington was lately
detected in the act of communicating information to the rebels and was
immediately discharged. A few day[s]
after he appeared at the Secretary’s office with a letter asking his
re-appointment. This letter was from a
Governor of one of the Western States.
He writes to the Secretary that the ex-clerk is an old and intimate friend of his, a good and loyal citizen, has
been most unjustly dealt by, and winds up by asking it as a particular personal favor that the
ex-Clerk be reinstated in his office.
And the request was immediately complied with! Directly after an acquaintance meeting Mr.
Reinstated said to him:
“Where did you get acquainted with Governor _____?”
“I never was acquainted with him – never spoke to him in my
life.”
“How then did you get such a strong letter from him to the
Secretary?”
“Oh I have a pretty sister who went to Alexandria the other
day with the Governor. She procured the
letter for me.”
The story is well authenticated and the writer believes it
is true. But what should be the
punishment of a man who would thus betray his country or what is the same in
effect protect those who would betray it?
– Published in The Burlington Weekly Hawk-Eye,
Burlington, Iowa, Saturday, February 1, 1862, p. 3
No comments:
Post a Comment