Vienna, September 21, 1862.
Dearest Little Mary:
Your last letters, 1st and 2d September, reached us with promptness, and gave
us the same mingled pain and pleasure that your letters always do. You are a
dear darling to write to us so faithfully and conscientiously, and we look
forward to our weekly budget from “our own correspondent” with great eagerness.
You say in your last that Mrs. Lothrop's third son is going to the war. I
cannot sufficiently admire their spirit and patriotism and her courage. I had
such a nice, interesting, well-written letter from Julius at Newbern. I wish
you would ask Mrs. Lothrop when she writes to thank him for it, and to say that
I have not yet answered it simply because I have nothing agreeable or
interesting to say from this part of the world. One of these days, when affairs
are looking less gloomy, I shall take pleasure in sending an answer to his
letter. Meanwhile I am delighted to hear of his promotion to a lieutenancy, and
wish him every success.
The most amazing part of the whole matter is that people
should now go about talking to each other of the “Constitution and the
enforcement of the laws” exactly as if we were at peace. We are not in peace.
We are in war. And the law of war is perfectly simple. It is to use all and
every means necessary for overcoming the resistance of your enemy. Had
government issued a proclamation of universal freedom to all men, in the
exercise of its unequivocal and unquestioned rights as a belligerent, at about
the time when the “Young Napoleon” was burrowing in the Chickahominy swamps, it
would have done more toward overcoming the resistance of the enemy by cutting
off the great source of their supplies than the whole of that ignominious
campaign in the Peninsula, which has brought us, in spite of the unparalleled
heroism, endurance, patience, and unflinching courage of our soldiers, back to
exactly the same point (to make the best of it) from which we started a year
ago. Tell Dr. Holmes that I received his letter of the 4th September yesterday,
and that it gave me inexpressible comfort.
I shall write him next week. I agree with every word he
says, and it gives me great pleasure to hear him say that the antislavery
feeling is on the increase in Boston. Of one thing I feel perfectly certain,
although everything else seems obscure as midnight. If Jeff Davis gets half the
country, he will get the whole. If we keep half, we shall keep the whole. I
mean by “we” the antislavery party of the country.
As to arming the slaves and drilling them as soldiers, I do
not care so much about that, except as a means of preventing servile
insurrections. Black men, as well as white men, are susceptible of military
discipline, and soldiers in the army of whatever color must be shot for
massacre and murder. The very reason which always prevented me from being an
abolitionist before the war, in spite of my antislavery sentiments and
opinions, now forces me to be an emancipationist. I did not wish to see the
government destroyed, which was the avowed purpose of the abolitionists. When
this became the avowed purpose of the slaveholders, when they made war upon us,
the whole case was turned upside down. The antislavery men became the
Unionists, the slaveholders the destructionists. This is so plain that no
mathematical axiom is plainer. There is no way of contending now with the enemy
at our gates but by emancipation.
Poor Fletcher Webster! I saw him on the Common at the head
of his regiment; he looked like a man and has died like one. I am beginning to
think that they who are dying for their country are happier than those of us
who are left. Another old schoolfellow of mine was killed too, Phil Kearny
(General Kearny)—the bravest of the brave. Good-by, darling. My love to
grandmama and grandpapa and all the family.
Your affectionate
Papa.
SOURCE: George William Curtis, editor, The
Correspondence of John Lothrop Motley in Two Volumes, Library Edition,
Volume 2, p. 284-6
No comments:
Post a Comment