North Shore, 13th April, 1860.
My Dear Pinkerton,
— Thanks for your kind response. I have had the same suspicion of Pennsylvania,
but my general feeling is this: that the nomination of Mr. Bates would so chill
and paralyze the youth and ardor which are the strength of the Republican
party; would so cheer the Democrats as a merely available move, showing
distrust of our own position and power; would so alienate the German Northwest,
and so endanger a bolt from the straight Republicans of New England, — that the
possible gain of Pennsylvania and New Jersey, and even Indiana, might be
balanced. Add to this that defeat with Bates is the utter destruction of our
party organization, and that success with him is very doubtful victory, and I
cannot but feel that upon the whole his nomination is an act of very uncertain
wisdom.
It is very true that there is no old Republican, because the
party is young, and it will not do to ask too sharply when a man became
a Republican. Moreover, a man like Mr. Bates may very properly have been a
Fillmore man in '56, because he might not have believed that the Slavery party
was as resolved and desperate as it immediately showed itself in the Dred Scott
business; this is all true, but human nature cries out against the friends of
Fremont in '56 working for a Fillmore man in '60, and there is a good deal of
human nature in the public. The nomination of Mr. Bates will plunge the really
Republican States into a syncope. If they are strong enough to remain
Republican while they are apathetic, then in the border States you may decide
the battle.
I think New York is very sure for the Chicago man, whoever
he is; but if Bates is the man, we shall have to travel upon our muscle!!
Individually believing, as I do, in the necessary triumph of our cause by
causes superior to the merely political, I should prefer a fair fight upon the
merits of the case between Douglas and Seward, or Hunter or Guthrie and Seward.
I think Douglas will be the Charleston man.
Thank you once more.
Yours faithfully,
George William Curtis.
SOURCE: Edward Cary, George
William Curtis, p. 130-2
No comments:
Post a Comment