If proof were
wanting of the patriotic ardor of the President for the peace and well being of
the country, it would be found abundantly in the message sent yesterday to
Congress. Mr. Lincoln appreciates the infinite difficulty of the Slavery
question. He evidently despairs of prostrating the institution by force of the
war-power; he looks to its existence in full vigor, throughout the Gulf States
at least, when the war shall have ended. The utmost reach of his practical
dealing with the subject is to strip it of political influence in National
affairs. To effect this capital object, there is certainly no way so sure as to
destroy the identity of interest between Border Slave States and those at the
southward; and this object the President's suggestion proposes to attain. It
takes the form of a joint resolution submitted to the consideration of
Congress. The possibility of one or more States discovering the impolicy of
retaining slave-labor is assumed. To such the joint resolution offers pecuniary
aid in the task of emancipation, by engaging to pay a sum prefixed for each
enslaved negro set at liberty. This bounty the President evidently believes
will turn the scale in favor of freedom. Satisfied of the good faith of the
National Government in its professions of non-intervention in the legislation
of the States, the States will be ready to look favorably upon a plan which,
while it makes the merit of the act of emancipation their own, throws the cost
elsewhere. And as the plan is adopted, one after another of the northerly Slave
States will array themselves on the side of the free communities of the North.
In considering
the Presidential project, a number of difficulties will no doubt suggest
themselves to Congress. Any State disposed to part with its negroes will
naturally offer them in the best market. The extreme South, in the supposition
raised by Mr. Lincoln that Slavery will there retain all its vitality, will
compete with the North in the purchase of the discarded labor; and must of
necessity offer prices which the North will be unable to pay. When peace shall
be restored -- always assuming the President to be right in regard to Slavery
in the Gulf States – Kentucky will be able to get $130,000,000 for her negroes
at the South, while the North, presupposing the round price of $200 – the
highest rate heretofore named, and considered practicable – would be able to
offer only one-third of that amount. If by an act of gradual emancipation
Kentucky is thus able at any moment to get the larger sum for her slaves, what
temptation to the passage of such an act will be the offer of the smaller?
Congress will also have to weigh well that incessantly recurring question, what
shall be done with the negroes when freed? Their freedom in any border State
will no doubt be followed by their expulsion. Even from Illinois, Mr. Lincoln's
immediate State, the blacks are about to be expelled. Will it not be necessary
for the National Government to provide also for their removal from the country,
and their colonization and christianization in a new and distant home? And will
not this cost, added to the other, constitute a total from which the country,
already startled at the coming terror of war taxation, will draw back appalled
? We fear that the Presidential plan will not achieve the good for which it is
so patriotically designed. It will not induce any Slave State to discard
Slavery; it will not, therefore, weaken any of the ties between the collective
Slave States. It will offer no sufficient reason for departing, even in
appearance, from the doctrine that, with Slavery in the States, the National Government
has no concern whatever. It will be attended with an expense too overwhelming
to be regarded favorably by a people who have already upon their shoulders the
burden present and prospective of a debt of several thousands of millions – a
burden placed there by Slavery. But let the plan have full discussion; let it
also have full credit, as evidence that the Government contemplates no forcible
interference with the institutions of any State, rebellious or loyal, and
desirable good may grow out of it.
– Published in The New
York Times, March 7, 1862
No comments:
Post a Comment