But little additional intelligence from Rosecrans and the
South. We have information of a failure on our part at Sabine Pass, where an
attempt was made to capture formidable batteries with frail boats, the army as
spectators. The expedition appears to have been badly conceived, planned, and
executed. A large military force was sent to take these batteries. Neither
General Halleck nor the Secretary of War consulted the Navy in this matter.
General Banks appears to have originated it, and made a requisition on
Commodore Bell, who readily responded, in the absence of Farragut, with light
boats built for transporting passengers in Northern rivers. Admiral Farragut
was at the Navy Department when dispatches were received from Commodore Bell,
stating that application for cooperation and aid had been made on him, and how
he had answered the call. When Farragut read the dispatch, he laid down the
paper and said to me: “The expedition will be a failure. The army officers have
an impression that naval vessels can do anything; this call is made for boats
to accompany an army expedition; it is expected the Navy will capture the
batteries, and, the army being there in force with a general in command, they
will take the credit. But there will be no credit in the case, and you may
expect to hear of disaster. These boats which Bell has given them cannot
encounter batteries; they might cooperate with and assist the army, but that is
evidently not the object. The soldiers should land and attack in the rear, and
the vessels aid them in front. But that is not the army plan. The soldiers are
not to land until the Navy had done an impossibility, with such boats. Therefore
there will be disaster.” The news of to-day verifies his prediction. This
Sabine expedition was substituted, I suppose, for that of Indianola, which I
suggested, and we may now have the promised word of General Halleck. He will
have heard from Banks.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 441-2
No comments:
Post a Comment