My letter to the
Naval Committee in relation to the contract of Paul S. Forbes for the Idaho has
disturbed certain parties. It interposes pretty decisive objections against
lobby intrigues and deviations from the contract. Certain party men wish to be
considered economists, and yet would be glad to pay Forbes a few hundred
thousand dollars more than the contract price. They would be glad to censure
the Department, but find they cannot do this and occupy an economical position.
Forbes acts stupidly. His vessel is likely to prove a failure. He cannot build her
and complete her on his own offer. He has proved himself less sagacious and
less capable than he had the reputation of being, or than he himself supposed
he was, but yet makes no admission of error and failure.
Forney1
and the Union Representatives of Philadelphia have appealed to me to reinstate
Hoover, the Naval Constructor, whom they pronounce an honest man, etc., backed
by a formidable list of names. I wrote Forney that Hoover had been guilty of
accepting bribes and that I could not give him my confidence, and requested him
to so inform his associates. He answers in an apologetic letter and promises to
be more careful in future. I saw him at one of McCulloch's receptions, and told
him the correspondence ought to be published in order to set the Department
right. He assented and said he would publish it with his last letter if I had
no objection. I assented and sent him the correspondence and after a day or two
he writes that he has consulted with the Union Representatives and concluded
the disclosure was not best. In reply, I state that if I rightly understand
them, they wish to have the Philadelphia public remain ignorant of the facts,
and continue to believe the Department oppressive. Differing with them, I ask a
return of the correspondence.
_______________
1 John W. Forney, Secretary of the Senate.
SOURCE: Gideon
Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and
Johnson, Vol. 2: April 1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, p. 418-9
No comments:
Post a Comment