Clear, and very cold. We lost
gun-boat Drewry yesterday in an unsuccessful attempt to destroy the enemy's
pontoon bridge down the river. Fort Harrison was not taken as reported, nor is
it likely to be.
The rumor of an armistice
remains, nevertheless, and Mr. Blair dined with the President on Sunday, and
has had frequent interviews with him. This is published in the papers, and will
cause the President to be severely censured.
Congress failed to expel Mr.
Foote yesterday (he is off again), not having a two-thirds vote, but censured
him by a decided majority. What will it end in?
No successors yet announced
to Seddon and Campbell—Secretary and Assistant Secretary of War. Perhaps they
can be persuaded to remain.
After all, it appears that
our fleet did not return, but remains down the river; and as the enemy's
gun-boats have been mostly sent to North Carolina, Gen. Lee may give Grant some
trouble. If he destroys the bridges, the Federal troops on this side the river
will be cut off from their main army.
It is said the President has
signed the bill creating a commander-in-chief.
Rev. W. Spottswood Fontaine writes from Greensborough, N. C., that ——— reports that Senator Hunter is in favor of Virginia negotiating a separate peace with the United States, as the other States will probably abandon her to her fate, etc.
I saw Mr. Lyons to-day, who
told me Mr. Hunter dined with him yesterday, and that Gen. Lee took tea with
him last evening, and seemed in good spirits, hope, etc. Mr. Lyons thinks Gen.
Lee was always a thorough emancipationist. He owns no slaves. He (Mr. Lyons)
thinks that using the negroes in the war will be equivalent to universal
emancipation, that not a slave will remain after the President's idea (which he
don't seem to condemn) is expanded and reduced to practice. He favors sending
out a commissioner to Europe for aid, on the basis of emancipation, etc., as a
dernier ressort. He thinks our cause has received most injury from Congress, of
which he is no longer a member.
If it be really so, and if it
were generally known, that Gen. Lee is, and always has been opposed to slavery,
how soon would his great popularity vanish like the mist of the morning! Can it
be possible that he has influenced the President's mind on this subject? Did he
influence the mind of his father-in-law, G. W. Park Custis, to emancipate his
hundreds of slaves? Gen. Lee would have been heir to all, as his wife was an
only child. There's some mistake about it.
The Secretary of State (still
there!) informs the Secretary of War (still here!) that the gold he wrote about
to the President on the 18th inst. for Gen. Hardee and for Mr. Conrad, is ready
and subject to his order.
Four steamers have run into
Charleston with a large amount of commissary stores. This is providential.
SOURCE: John Beauchamp
Jones, A Rebel War Clerk's Diary at the Confederate
States Capital, Volume 2, p. 397-8
No comments:
Post a Comment