It is perhaps too much to expect of our enlightened
Congressmen that they shall inform themselves of what their predecessors in the
National Legislature thought and said on subjects they are now discussing. If
they would take this trouble, however, it would often, certainly, save a great
deal of time that might be otherwise better employed. For instance, the House
of Representatives consumed the best part of Saturday last in debating the
military capacity of the Blacks. Now, this whole question was thoroughly
discussed in the very first Congress held in 1790; and if the honorable members
had taken the pains to consult their files of GALES & SEATON, they might
have saved themselves a good deal of pulmonary exercitation, without leaving the country any less wise
than it was before. The using of the Blacks is a question of practical policy
which may or may not be adopted, as exigencies shall demand; but speculations
on the military capacity of the
negroes are abstractions that can lead to nothing. Meanwhile, we commend to
Messrs. WICKLIFFE, MALLORY & Co., who think “negroes are naturally afraid
of guns,” and that “one shot from a cannon would disperse thirty thousand of
them,” the views of another Southern member some seventy-two years ago. Mr.
SMITH, member from South Carolina, in
the House of Representatives 1790, in the course of an elaborate debate on the
question, said:
"Negroes, it was said, would not fight; but he would
ask whether it was owing to their being black, or to their being slaves? If to
their being black, then emancipating them would not remedy the evil, for they
would still remain black; If it was owing to their being slaves, he denied the
position; for it was an undeniable truth that in many countries slaves made
excellent soldiers. * * Had experience proved that the negroes would not make
good soldiers? He did not assert that they would, but they had never been
tried. Discipline was everything; white militia made but indifferent soldiers
before they were disciplined. It was well known that, according to the present
art of war, a soldier was a mere machine, and
he did not see why a black machine was not as good as a white one; and in one
respect the black troops would have the advantage — in appearing more horrible
in the eyes of the enemy.”
SOURCE: The New York Times, New York, New York, Monday, July
7, 1862, p. 4
No comments:
Post a Comment