Washington, D. C., Feb. 3,1846.
Dear Crawford,
Yours in relation to the Galphin claim came to hand last night and I will
examine the case you cite. I turned over the papers relating to the claim to Judge
Berrien some weeks ago who I think likewise turned them over to Mr. McDuffie
who is to bring the subject before the Senate. This I think the better course.
They have more time in the Senate, and being a smaller body are more disposed
to attend to the real merits of the case. If a favourable report can be got
through that body it will stand a much better chance in our House. And should
it come there I would do all that labour, research and investigation can do to
effect its passage. I have bestowed a good deal of attention to the subject and
am clearly of opinion that it is founded in right and justice and ought to be
passed. Our time however for some weeks, as you see from the papers, has been
taken up almost exclusively with the Oregon debate, and when we will bring that
to a close I am wholly unable to conjecture. Every one in the House I believe
(myself alone excepted) is desirous of making a speech upon the subject. Even
those who have spoken are anxious many of them to make another. But I suppose
the debate will be ended in the House when it is taken up in the Senate, which
will take place next week. It is a subject I feel no disposition to speak upon
in its present shape and condition, and I partake very little of that
excitement in relation to it which seems to prevail amongst others. I am for
our rights as far as they are clear, and in maintaining them thus far I should
not suffer myself to be influenced by any considerations growing out of a fear
or apprehension of war. Nor do I conceive that the questions of peace or war
are at all involved in terminating the joint occupancy under the convention of
1818. It seems to me that such a measure would only bring about a settlement of
our boundary, which ought to be done, as our people are new going there in
large companies for the purpose of colonizing. Whether this will lead to a
rupture with England or not I cannot pretend to say. It ought not, and will not
if properly managed. But one thing is certain, our government will have to
recede from the position of Mr. Polk that our "title to the whole of the
territory is clear and unquestionable ", or war will be inevitable unless
I greatly mistake the temper of the British Government. The war however will not
be the result of the giving the notice but subsequent legislation taking
possession of the whole of the country. And this I am not prepared to do, and
will not do, for I do not think our rights clear to that extent. And I moreover
think that the whole subject is proper for negotiation and settlement upon
terms of mutual compromise. And if I may go a step further I think this will be
the result of the whole matter. If the notice is given, negotiations (if the
President does his duty) will be opened, he will recede from his position, and
the controversy will ultimately be ended in some sort of amicable adjustment. I
can not bring myself to the belief that war will result. But enough of this. I
am doing what I can to facilitate the settlement of the amount of our state at
the Treasury Department, but my progress is slow. I sent you some papers upon
this subject a few days ago.
P. S. — My health is good, much better than it has been for
several years.
_______________
* Governor of Georgia, 1843-1847, Secretary of War in
Taylor's Cabinet, 1849-1850. He was for many years attorney for the Galphin
claimants.
SOURCE: Ulrich Bonnell Phillips, Editor, The Annual
Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1911, Volume 2: The
Correspondence of Robert Toombs, Alexander H. Stephens, and Howell Cobb, p.
71-2
No comments:
Post a Comment