The Chronicle of this morning contains my letter with some
errors, to the Senate in response to a call relating to transfers. It makes some commotion among the members of
congress, and will cause some in the War Department I presume.
There was nothing of special interest to day in the
cabinet. Stanton was not present, nor
was Blair. Chase calls for largely additional taxes which I have no doubt are
necessary. There should have been heavier
taxes the last two years. At least
double what have been collected.
Undoubtedly demagogues will try to prevent this necessary measure for
party ends, but I believe the good sense and intelligence of the people will
prevail over the debasing abuse of party.
I apprehend that Chase is not making the most of his position, and think
he has committed some errors. No one
could have altogether avoided them.
Seward spoke to me concerning the case of the Sir William
Peel, captured at the mouth of the Rio Grande.
Had carried contraband ostensibly to Matamoras, but portions had gone
direct to Brownsville, and cotton brought direct from that place in
return. It is claimed, however that she
was captured in Mexican waters though near the U. States, and therefore Seward
says she must be given up. I asked him
to whom. If captured in Mexican waters,
no power but Mexico could make the claim.
This he undertook to deny, provided the government of Mexico was
enfeebled by revolution and not able to sustain itself. But, I told him, if able to assert and
maintain neutrality, then she, and she alone could intervene. If not able to maintain her claim of neutrality,
no other one could make a claim of Mexican jurisdiction.
I am fearful he will make a miss-fire on this question. He has never looked into maritime law, and
will make any sacrifice of national or individual rights to keep in with England.
SOURCES: William E. Gienapp & Erica L. Gienapp, Editors,
The Civil War Diary of Gideon Wells:
Lincoln’s Secretary of the Navy, p. 383-4; *Gideon Welles, Diary of
Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 2: April
1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, p. 3-4 which reprinted the entry of March 30, 1864
under the date of April 1, 1864.
No comments:
Post a Comment