Went with G. W.
Blunt to see the President this morning. Blunt wants to be Naval Officer and
has been a true and earnest friend of the Navy Department during the War and
boldly met our opponents when friends were needed. Of course I feel a personal
regard for him and have two or three times told the President that, personally,
Blunt was my choice. If other than personal consideration governed I had
nothing to say.
After Blunt left,
the President and myself had a little conversation. I expressed my apprehension
that there were some persons acting in bad faith with him. Some men of position
were declaring that he and Congress were assimilating and especially on the
Constitutional change. He interrupted me to repeat what he said to McCulloch
and me,—that he was opposed to them and opposed to any change while any portion
of the States were excluded. I assured him I well knew his views, but that
others near and who professed to speak for him held out other opinions. I
instanced the New York Times, the well-known organ
of a particular set, which was constantly giving out that the President and
Congress were almost agreed, and that the Republican Party must and would be
united. The fact that every Republican Representative had voted for the
changes, that the State Department had hastened off authenticated copies to the
State Executives before submitting to him, the idea promulgated that special
sessions of the legislatures in the States were to be called to immediately
ratify the amendments, or innovations, showed concert and energy of action in a
particular direction, but that it was not on the road which he was traveling.
He answered by
referring to yesterday's conversation with Seward; said he had sent early
yesterday morning to stop action at the State Department, but found the
circulars had been sent off. He seemed not aware that there was design in this
hasty, surreptitious movement.
SOURCE: Gideon
Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and
Johnson, Vol. 2: April 1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, pp. 532-3
No comments:
Post a Comment