Showing posts with label Slave Marriages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Slave Marriages. Show all posts

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Mr. Thompson at Lynn, published June 13, 1835

[From the Lynn Record,]

This distinguished young friend and disciple of Wilberforce, and justly celebrated orator, who has been repeatedly invited by the Anti-Slavery Society of this town, arrived on Saturday afternoon last, and was received with great satisfaction and delight. The society had a meeting on business, at the Town Hall, at the close of which, Mr. Thompson addressed a large crowded assembly of people, ladies and gentlemen, nearly two hours, in a strain of eloquence and power, quite beyond any thing we ever heard, and equally beyond our power to describe. All were held, as if by enchantment, to the close. It would be difficult to decide in which he most excelled, matter or manner. He took a comprehensive and varied view of the enormous injustice and evil of slavery, and brought up and considered the most prominent and popular objections to the plan of immediate abolition, and exposed their hypocrisy and absurdity in his own peculiar and effectual manner of cutting sarcasm. The effect was evidently great.

After Mr. Thompson had closed, a stern Pharisaical looking man, who had been sitting near the speaker, announcing himself as a preacher of the Gospel, from the South, desired the privilege of putting a few questions to Mr. Thompson, which was readily granted, and the questions as readily answered, to the satisfaction of the audience generally. The object of the stranger was to cavil and carp at what had been said. But the tables were adroitly turned upon the poor man, in a manner least expected, and most mortifying to him. One of the questions, in substance at least, was—‘Do you consider every slaveholder a thief?’ ‘I consider every person who holds and claims the right of holding his fellow being, as property, A MAN STEALER.’

After several questions, captious in their nature, had been asked and answered, Mr. Thompson turned upon his assailant, ‘If you have now done, sir, I, in turn, should like to ask you a few questions.’

‘Do you consider slavery a sin?’
‘I consider slavery a moral evil.’
Do you consider slavery a sin?’
‘I do consider slavery a sin.’
‘Is the marriage of slaves legal in the Southern States?’
‘It is legalized in Maryland.’
‘Can the Slaveholder, by the laws of Maryland, separate husband and wife?’
‘He can,’ &c. &c.

The gentleman stranger, (who is said to belong to Springfield in this state, formerly from the South) appealed to the people, but finally withdrew his appeal, and declared himself ‘satisfied.’ Whether satisfied or not, we believe he had as much as he could digest, and as much as he could swallow, including the question and answer system.

On Sunday evening, Mr. Thompson delivered a lecture on Slavery, in a religious view, as opposed to the doctrines of the Bible. The meeting-house (Rev. Mr. Peabody's) was much crowded, and many went away unable to gain admittance.

On Monday evening, Mr. Thompson lectured on the sin of slavery, before a newly formed ‘Anti-Slavery Society, of the New England Conference of Methodist Episcopal Ministers, consisting of about 60 or 70 Ministers—(a glorious phalanx!) at the South street Methodist meetinghouse. The house was well filled; but owing to a misunderstanding by many, that the lecture was to be delivered at the Woodend Meeting-house, (which was otherwise engaged) all who went were enabled to get in. The lecture was a powerful and splendid production both in argument and in manner of delivery.

On Tuesday evening, Mr. Thompson lectured at the Friend’s meeting-house, which is very large, and was thoroughly filled. He was assisted by Rev. A. A. Phelps, one of the public Agents of the Society, whose address was able, and well received. Mr. Garrison and several other friends of the cause, from Boston and Salem, were present. Mr. T. took occasion to glance at the past history and conduct of the Friends in regard to slavery, the lively interest they had taken in the cause of the oppressed, and the liberal contributions they had made; and exhorted to a continuance in the ways of well doing.

There may be men in our own country of more learning and more depth of mind, and strength of reasoning, than Mr. Thompson, though, we think, rarely to be found; but for readiness and skill in debate, and splendor of eloquence, as an orator, we believe he stands unrivalled. His amiableness, mildness of temper, urbanity, and blandness of manners and deportment, are adapted to win the love and affection of all, who are honored with his acquaintance. That the haughty, and the envious, should whisper their malignant hints that something evil is lurking about his character, is no more than may be naturally expected; though they are most fully and satisfactorily refuted by his numerous and honorable testimonials of respect which we have seen, from benevolent societies and individuals in England, where he is well known. These all breathe the warm friendship and esteem which goodness and greatness of soul alone can inspire.

The independence of mind which Mr. Thompson possesses, is one of the most striking and important traits in his excellent character. He shrinks from nothing. He is ready to attack sin and wickedness in every shape—in high or low places: and his thrusts never miss—never fail of effect.

The name of ‘Mr. George Thompson’ was often associated in the public journals, with distinguished orators and philanthropists, at the various public meetings of benevolent societies in England, long before he embarked for this country. He was there ranked among the most able and popular orators. But here, in this country, there are certain would-be great men, who dare not meet Mr. Thompson in the open field, who vent their pitiful malice, and strive to induce others to treat him with that neglect, to which themselves are so well entitled; because he brings out and exposes to the light of day their works of darkness.

‘He is a foreigner—he has no right to come here interfering with our laws, our customs, and our private rights.’


Very fine, indeed! Capital! Who has a right to interfere, or say a word, if a man murders his wife and children, or sells them into bondage? It was all his own family concern. Who has a right to express an opinion of the Turks, when oppressing, starving, and murdering the Greeks, not only men, but helpless women and children : Who has a right to express an opinion against the Russians for similar conduct toward the Poles, under similar circumstances, as the latter were the vassals of the former, in both cases? Who has a right to send Gospel missionaries abroad among the benighted heathen, groping in darkness, in order to instruct and enlighten them in the way of truth? WE—we, the American people, the ‘sons of liberty,’ claim the right, and exercise it too; without once being asked, why do ye so We, the American people, claim and exercise the right, when the laws of God— the eternal laws of truth and justice, and humanity, are broken, to expose the sin, and to ‘reprove, rebuke and exhort the transgressor.

‘But slavery was brought to our shores and entailed on us by England, against our consent, when we were under her government; and now shall England send men here to complain of the injustice and cruelty of the act, when we should be glad to get rid of the evil, but cannot?’

Reason answers, Yes. If England did wrong, and afterward saw the evil, repented, and brought forth fruits meet for repentance, by liberating all their own slaves, was it not right—was it not a christian duty, to extend their acts of kindness to us also, whom they had led into error; to tell us what they had done, and how they did it ; and to aid and assist us to get out of the difficulty ? The law of God is universal. The law of Christians—the law of love, is universal; and requires the subjects of that law to oppose and expose sin and oppression wherever they are found. We send Ministers, political, religious, and masonic, to England and other places—to co-operate—to ask and give assistance, and mutually to benefit each other. But what can we, in the Northern States do? We can say, slavery is ‘a sin. We can enlighten public sentiment on the subject, and cause the sin of slavery—the greatest sin in the world, to become odious: and public sentiment in this country has the force of law, to correct any evil.

To assist us in these labors of love, Mr. Thompson has been sent among us, by the friends of humanity in England; and a most efficient and powerful co-worker he is, sweeping away the refuges of lies, and carrying his principles as a mighty sweeping torrent, wherever he goes. The advocates of slavery fear and hate him, the humane and philanthropic love him, and all respect and admire his talents, whatever they may pretend.

Mr. Thompson possesses all the requisites of an impressive and powerful orator—a fund of acquired knowledge, a brilliant imagination, natural pathos, a powerful voice, an elegant form, graceful gesticulation, a countenance capable of expressing any passion or emotion, and lastly, the most important of all, a benevolent heart—an expansive soul.

SOURCES: Isaac Knapp, Publisher, Letters and Addresses by G. Thompson [on American Negro Slavery] During His Mission in the United States, From Oct. 1st, 1834, to Nov. 27, 1835, p. 88-92; “Mr. Thompson at Lynn,” The Liberator, Boston, Massachusetts, Saturday, June 13, 1835, p. 3.

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Thomas C. Stuart to Reverend Asa Cummings, April 9, 1839

The Presbytery of Tombechee being in session, at Starksville Mississippi, April 9th, 1839. A communication was received from Rev. Asa Cummings, in behalf of the General Conference of Congregational Churches in Maine, to which Rev. Henry Reid and Rev. Samuel Hurd were appointed a committee to reply. The Committee reported, and their Report was received and adopted, and the stated clerk directed to forward it, as follows; viz.

To The Committee Of General Conference Of Congregational Churches In Maine.

DEAR BRETHREN, Your communication of the 28th of December 1838, directed to the Rev. Henry Reid for the use of the Presbytery of Tombechee, was duly received. Presbytery will cheerfully give it that attention which its importance and courtesy demand. — The subject involved is delicate, and daily becomes more so, from the morbid sensibilities which are excited pro and con. Such excitement has done much evil, and no good. It has not been the means of making better citizens, better men, or better Christians, in the South, the East, the North, or the West. It has been adding fuel to a flame, that ought to have been extinguished long ago, by the waters of patriotism and Christian affection. On the subject of Slavery we are willing to be guided by the Bible, the unerring word of truth. Where it condemns, we condemn; where it approves, we approve; we are not unwilling for the whole world to know our views on the subject of Slavery. We hold no principles, of which we are ashamed. You say, “The subject of slavery has been introduced into a majority of these Conferences and declared by them to be opposed to natural and revealed law.” This Presbytery does not understand what is meant by “natural law,” as used by the Committee, therefore can give no opinion; but with respect to “revealed law,” it presumes the Bible is meant. In the Bible the state of slavery is clearly recognized, but the condition of the slave, like that of all society, is left to be regulated by the civil police of the state, or country in which it exists. Abram, the friend of God, had slaves born in his house, and bought with his money. “And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man-child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed. He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. Genesis 17: 12, 13, 23, 27. See also 12: 16 and 14: 14. Isaac possessed slaves, as is evident from Gen. 26: 14. For he had possession of flocks, and possession of herds, and great store of servants: and the Philistines envied him. Jacob held slaves without the least remorse of conscience, or reproof from God, as will be seen from Genesis 30 : 43 and 32: 5. The Lord himself directed Moses and Aaron, how slaves were to be treated with respect to the passover. The Lord said unto Moses and Aaron, This is the ordinance of the passover; there shall no stranger eat thereof. But every man servant that is bought for money, when thou hast circumcised him, then shall he eat thereof Exodus 12: 43,44. Slaves were allowed religious privileges, that were not granted to strangers, nor to hired servants. Exod. 12:45. A foreigner, and a hired servant shall not eat thereof. It was no sin for a priest to purchase a slave with his money; and the slave thus purchased was entitled to peculiar privileges. There shall no stranger eat of the holy thing: a sojourner of the priest, or a hired servant, shall not eat of the holy thing. But if the priest buy any soul with his money, he shall eat of it, and he that is born in his house: they shall eat of his meat. Leviticus 22: 10, 11. The Bible warrants the purchase of slaves as an inheritance for children forever. Leviticus 25: 46.And we shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession, they shall be your bondmen forever.

That slavery is not a moral evil, is evident from the fact, that it is no where condemned by the Redeemer, or his apostles in the New Testament. All principles, and all practices, which would exclude from the favor of God, and the kingdom of Heaven, are recorded with great plainness without respect of persons. Witness the manner in which the Scribes and Pharisees were addressed, “For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of Heaven.” Matthew 5: 20. In a long catalogue of denunciations against various sins by the Redeemer himself, contained in the 23d chapter of Matthew, and from the 13th to the 33d verses inclusive, not a word is said against the sin of slavery.

How does all this come to pass, if it be so “great an evil” as our Brethren seem to think? In the sermon on the Mount not a word is uttered against the sin of slavery. A Centurion came to Jesus in Capernaum, beseeching him, and saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented. And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him. The Centurion answered and said, Lord am not I worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof, but speak the word only; and my servant shall be healed. For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me, and I say unto this man, go; and he goeth; and to another, come, and he cometh; and to my servant, do this; and he doeth it. The Lord said, “I have not found so great faith, no not in Israel.” Matt. 8: 5–-10. The Centurion was a slaveholder, and instead of being reproved by the Savior, he received the highest commendation. Let us hear the mind of the Spirit by the mouth of the Apostle Paul. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these, Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murder, drunkenness, revellings, and such like; of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things, shall not inherit the kingdom of God. Gal. 5: 19–21. In the whole catalogue of prohibitions which disqualify for the kingdom of Heaven, slavery is not once named. — Did the Apostles say any thing on the subject that justifies its existence among a Christian people?

This Presbytery believes they did. — Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called. Art thou called being a servant? Care not for it; but if thou mayest be made free; use it rather. For he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman. Likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant... Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men. Brethren, let every man, wherein, he is called; therein abide with God. 1st Cor. 7: 20–24. The Bible makes slavery a part of the domestic circle; it is associated with husband and wife, parents and children. Slaves are directed in what manner they are to demean themselves, as members “of the civil and social compact. Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; not with eye service, as men pleasers, but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart; with good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men, knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether bond or free. And ye, masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening; knowing that your master also is in Heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him. Ephesians 6:5—9. Society is a whole, formed by infinite wisdom, with all its functions and functionaries. No honest calling is degraded, or degrading. — Each member of the social compact is to be honored and esteemed, while he continues to move cheerfully and usefully in his proper sphere.

As far back as history gives any account of human associations, whether savage or civil, there have been persons, whose peculiar prerogative it was to perform what is called menial service. The same exists at the present time amongst all the nations of the earth, in every neighborhood, and in each family throughout Christendom. — This Presbytery speaks of the fact, not of the name by which the fact is designated. It matters not whether the persons thus employed are called helps, servants, waiters, or slaves: they have to perform the same service; they have to submit to some rules for the time being; and they must be directed by their employers and if disobedient they must bear the penalty. The probability is that a majority of the whole human race is in this situation. To such, nominal freedom cannot be esteemed a very distinguished blessing, because no provision is made at the expense of the capitalist for the infirmities of the laborer's life, (viz.) helpless infancy, sickness, and decrepid age. With us, for such, ample provision is made. He who has received the benefit of the operator's strength and ingenuity in the prime of life, must nurse him in sickness, and sustain him in the decline of life. All this is done without a murmur. In countries of nominal freedom, an almshouse is the only refuge to which infirmity and old age, in such case, can look for relief— These are facts—open to the observation of all, who are disposed to look at things as they exist. The privileges of the church are the same to all, whether bond or free. All are under the same government. All are subject to the same discipline. A slave cannot be turned out of the church, except by a regular trial according to the rules laid down in our book. They are admitted to the membership of the church, precisely as other members are admitted. Being church members does not prohibit the possibility of being sold, because over the right of property, the church has no control; such authority belongs to another department.

Amongst Christians the voluntary sale of slaves seldom occurs; and where the master and slave are both Christians, perhaps never, unless to accommodate the slave, that he or she may not be separated from some dear relative about to emigrate. On the subject of marriage, the Presbytery feels that the state authorities, ought to make some alterations so as to entirely prevent, even forced sales, to separate husband and wife, They are not often separated, except under the influence of such sales.

Dear Brethren, this Presbytery has given you their honest and candid views on the subject of slavery. If they shall prove the means of giving you information, and setting your conscience at ease on the subject, it will be matter of much gratitude to Him, who has commanded his children to love as Brethren.

A true copy, Attest,
THoMAs C. STUART,
Stated Clerk of Presbytery.

REv. AsA CUMMINGs,

Dear Sir, * * I should have annexed, in its proper place, the following resolution, viz. “On motion, Resolved, that the Conference of Maine be requested to publish the reply of this Presbytery entire, with the addition of the Scriptures referred to.”

Your brother in Christ,
T. C. STUART.

SOURCE: Cyrus P. Grosvenor, Slavery vs. The Bible: A Correspondence Between the General Conference of Maine, and the Presbytery of Tombecbee, Mississippi, p. 10-22

Thursday, September 28, 2017

Diary of Salmon P. Chase, Thursday, May 1, 1862

Mr. [French] don't like many things; thinks the Unitarians don't get hold of the work in the right way. The negroes are mostly Baptists, and like emotional religion better than rational, so called. They “       to Jesus,” and can not understand a religion that is not founded on His divinity. Many marriages have been “confirmed” among them. He had laid much stress on the duty of regular marriages between those who have been living together without that sanction. On some plantations the masters had allowed and encouraged marriages by ministers — on others, little was cared about it. A good deal of cotton had been planted, and more corn. The work of cultivation was going on as well as could be expected. Mr. F. thought Mr. Snydam would make a good collector. I talked to General [Saxton] about the work before him. He said the Secretary of War had authorized him to procure one or two thousand red flannel suits for the blacks, with a view to organization. No arms to be supplied as yet.

SOURCE: Robert Bruce Warden, An Account of the Private Life and Public Services of Salmon Portland Chase, p. 420-1; See John Niven, editor, The Salmon P. Chase Papers, Volume 1: Journals, 1829-1872, p. 333-5 for the entire diary entry.