MR. CHAIRMAN: I have
been struck with one fact, that the best orators who have added their praise to
his fame and I need not go out of this house to find the purest eloquence in
the country — have one rival who comes off a little better, and that is John
Brown. Every thing that is said of him leaves people a little dissatisfied; but
as soon as they read his own speeches and letters they are heartily contented
such is the singleness of purpose which justifies him to the head and the heart
of all. Taught by this experience, I mean, in the few remarks I have to make,
to cling to his history, or let him speak for himself.
John Brown, the
founder of liberty in Kansas, was born in Torrington, Litchfield County, Conn.,
in 1800. When he was five years old his father emigrated to Ohio, and the boy
was there set to keep sheep, and to look after cattle, and dress skins; he went
bareheaded and barefooted, and clothed in buckskin. He said that he loved rough
play, could never have rough play enough; could not see a seedy hat without
wishing to pull it off. But for this it needed that the playmates should be
equal; not one in fine clothes and the other in buckskin; not one his own
master, hale and hearty, and the other watched and whipped. But it chanced that
in Pennsylvania, where he was sent by his father to collect cattle, he fell in
with a boy whom he heartily liked, and whom he looked upon as his superior.
This boy was a slave; he saw him beaten with an iron shovel, and otherwise
maltreated; he saw that this boy had nothing better to look forward to in life,
whilst he himself was petted and made much of; for he was much considered in
the family where he then stayed, from the circumstance that this boy of twelve
years had conducted alone a drove of cattle a hundred miles. But the colored
boy had no friend, and no future. This worked such indignation in him that he
swore an oath of resistance to Slavery as long as he lived. And thus his
enterprise to go into Virginia and run off five hundred or a thousand slaves,
was not a piece of spite or revenge, a plot of two years or of twenty years,
but the keeping of an oath made to heaven and earth forty-seven years before.
Forty-seven years at least, though I incline to accept his own account of the
matter, at Charlestown, which makes the date a little older, when he said,
"This was all settled millions of years before the world was made."
He grew up a
religious and manly person in severe poverty; a fair specimen of the best stock
of New England; having that force of thought and that sense of right which are
the warp and woof of greatness. Our farmers were Orthodox Calvinists, mighty in
the Scriptures; had learned that life was a preparation, a "probation"
to use their word, for a higher world, and was to be spent in loving and
serving mankind.
Thus was formed a
romantic character absolutely without any vulgar trait; living to ideal ends,
without any mixture of self-indulgence or compromise, such as lowers the value
of benevolent and thoughtful men we know; abstemious, refusing luxuries, not
sourly and reproachfully, but simply as unfit for his habit; quiet and gentle
as a child in the house. And, as happens usually to men of romantic character,
his fortunes were romantic. Walter Scott would have delighted to draw his
picture and trace his adventurous career. A shepherd and herdsman, he learned
the manners of animals, and knew the secret signals by which animals
communicate. He made his hard bed on the mountains with them; he learned to
drive his flock through thickets all but impassable; he had all the skill of a
shepherd by choice of breed, and by wise husbandry to obtain the best wool, and
that for a course of years. And the anecdotes preserved show a far-seeing skill
and conduct which, in spite of adverse accidents, should secure, one year with
another, an honest reward, first to the farmer, and afterwards to the dealer.
If he kept sheep, it was with a royal mind; and if he traded in wool, he was a
merchant prince, not in the amount of wealth, but in the protection of the
interests confided to him.
I am not a little
surprised at the easy effrontery with which political gentlemen, in and out of
Congress, take it upon them to say that there are not a thousand men in the
North who sympathize with John Brown. It would be far safer and nearer the
truth to say that all people, in proportion to their sensibility and
self-respect, sympathize with him. For it is impossible to see courage, and
disinterestedness, and the love that casts out fear, without sympathy.
All women are drawn
to him by their predominance of sentiment. All gentlemen, of course, are on his
side. I do not mean by "gentlemen," people of scented hair and
perfumed handkerchiefs, but men of gentle blood and generosity, "fulfilled
with all nobleness," who, like the Cid, give the outcast leper a share of
their bed; like the dying Sidney, pass the cup of cold water to the wounded
soldier who needs it more. For what is the oath of gentle blood and knighthood?
What but to protect the weak and lowly against the strong oppressor?
Nothing is more
absurd than to complain of this sympathy, or to complain of a party of men
united in opposition to Slavery—As well complain of gravity, or the ebb of the
tide. Who makes the Abolitionist? The Slaveholder. The sentiment of mercy is
the natural recoil which the laws of the universe provide to protect mankind
from destruction by savage passions. And our blind statesmen go up and down,
with committees of vigilance and safety, hunting for the origin of this new
heresy. They will need a very vigilant committee indeed to find its birthplace,
and a very strong force to root it out. For the arch-Abolitionist, older than
Brown, and older than the Shenandoah Mountains is Love, whose other name is
Justice, which was before Alfred, before Lycurgus, before Slavery, and will be
after it.
SOURCE: James
Redpath, Editor, Echoes of Harper’s Ferry, pp. 119-22