I think the
President, though calm and reticent, exhibits indications of not being fully
satisfied in some respects with the conduct and course of some in whom he has
confided; yet he carefully abstains from remarks respecting persons. There can
be no doubt that Stanton has given certain of the leading Radicals to
understand that his views correspond with theirs, but I do not know that the
President is fully aware of that fact. Seward, while he says nothing very
decisively, leaves no doubt that he coincides in the general policy of the
President. Harlan made a singular speech to the Iowa Radicals a week ago, but
has written an explanatory letter which is no explanation. I have no doubt that
Dennison is sincerely with the President and means to sustain his measures, yet
he makes visible, without intending it, his apprehension that by this policy
the Democrats may get a controlling influence. In this he is not singular, for
many of the leading Radicals, especially those of Whig antecedents, have
similar apprehensions and are afraid to trust the people. Having power, they do
not scruple at means to retain it.
1 The President was at this time greatly
embarrassed by the advice and suggestions of Mr. Seward, who, though personally
friendly to the President and the Administration, was himself so much of a
party man, and so much under the influence of extreme partisans, as to be
governed rather by party than by country. It was the aim and object of his New
York friends to keep alive party distinctions created by Secession and the War,
and to throw the power of the Administration into the Republican, or, in other
words, Radical, hands. New York is a great State and has local controversies of
its own, independent of the Federal Government, but the centralists could not
secure and hold the ascendancy there except by the aid of the Federal
Government. The New York politicians had, therefore, a double part to play, and
Mr. Seward was their agent to effect their purpose. Whilst Thad Stevens and the
extreme Radicals were making war on the Executive, it was important for the New
Yorkers, and indeed for men of similar views in other States not to break
immediately with the President, but to use the power and patronage of the
Executive to promote their own ends. He had been elected by them, and Mr.
Seward urged that he should not neglect them, even if they disagreed with him,
for he insisted that the Democrats, although their views were with him on
present questions, were opposed to him and his Administration. Party before
country was inculcated by both Radicals and Democrats. The President had in the
past as in the present placed country above party, and was consequently not a
favorite with either.
Almost all the
members of the Cabinet were strict party men and were subjected to severe
discipline in those days. Without an exception they approved the principles and
assented to the opinions and purposes of the President, but it was soon given
out that they must conform to the theory and doctrines of Thad Stevens if they
designed to preserve their Republican Party identity. Congress was the supreme
department of the Government and must be recognized as the supreme power.
Members of Congress must be permitted to exercise executive duties. The
legislative department must control the action of the Government, prescribe its
policy, its measures, and dictate appointments to the executive, or
subordinate, department. Most of the members of the Cabinet acquiesced or
submitted to the usurpation. No appointments or nominations to office made by
the Executive, who was bound to see the laws executed, were confirmed by the
Senate, except the nominees were first recommended or indorsed by Radical
Members of Congress. Some of the Cabinet under these circumstances surrendered
and made terms.
Mr. Seward advised
that there should be compromise and concession. The President, unwilling to
break with those who elected him, yielded and failed to make a stand and appeal
to his countrymen for support. As a consequence, the unscrupulous Radicals
wielded the government in all its departments.—G. W.
SOURCE: Gideon
Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and
Johnson, Vol. 2: April 1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, p. 424-6
No comments:
Post a Comment