Fort Hill 13th April
1849.
MY DEAR SIR, I am
glad to learn by your letter and from other Sources, that a meeting is to be
held next month in Columbia, to be composed of delegates from the different
Commitees of correspondence. I regard it as a step of much importance and
responsibility.
You ask my opinion
as to the course the Meeting should take. Before I give it, I deem it due to
candour and the occasion to State, that I am of the impression that the time is
near at hand when the South will have to chose between disunion, and
submission. I think so, because I see little prospect of arresting the
aggression of the North. If anything can do it, it would be for the South to
present with an unbroken front to the North the alternative of dissolving the
partnership or of ceasing on their part to violate our rights and to disregard
the stipulations of the
Constitution in our favour; and that too without delay. I say without
delay; for it may be well doubted whether the alienation between the two
sections has not already gone too far to save the Union; but, if it has not,
there can be none that it soon will, if not prevented by some prompt and
decisive measure. It has been long on the increase and is now more rapidly
increasing than ever. The prospect is as things now stand, that before four
years have elapsed, the Union will be divided into two great hostile sectional
parties.
But it will be
impossible to present such a front, except by means of a Convention of the
Southern States. That, and that only could speak for the whole, and present
authoritatively to the North the alternative, which to choose. If such a
presentation should fail to save the Union, by arresting the aggression of the
North and causing our rights and the stipulations of the Constitution in our
favour to be respected, it would afford proof conclusive that it could not be
saved, and that nothing was left us, but to save ourselves. Having done all we
could to save the Union, we would then stand justified before God and man to
dissolve a partnership which had proved inconsistent with our safety, and, of
course, distructive of the object which mainly induced us to enter into it.
Viewed in this light, a Convention of the South is an indispensible means to
discharge a great duty we owe to our partners in the Union; that is, to warn
them in the most solemn manner that if they do not desist from aggression, and
cease to disregard our rights and the stipulations of the Constitution, the
duty we owe to ourselves and our posterity would compel us to dissolve forever
the partnership with them. But should its warning voice fail to save the Union,
it would in that case prove the most efficient of all means for saving
ourselves. It would give us the great advantage of enjoying the conscious
feeling of having done all we could to save it and thereby free us from all
responsibility in reference to it, while it would afford the most efficient
means of United and prompt action, and thereby of meeting the momentous
occasion without confusion or disorder, and with certainty of success.
Thus thinking, my
opinion is that the great object to be aimed at by the Meeting is to adopt
measures to prepare the way for a Convention of the Southern States. What they
should be the Meeting can best decide. It seems to me, however, that the
organization of our own and the other Southern States is an indispensible step
and for that and other purposes there ought to be an able Committee appointed
having its center in Charleston, or Columbia, and vested with power to take
such steps as may be deemed necessary to carry into effect that and the other
measures which may be adopted by the Meeting.
* From a draft in
Calhoun's handwriting. John H. Means was an active secessionist, was chosen
governor of South Carolina the next year, and was killed, a Confederate colonel,
at the second battle of Bull Run.
SOURCE: J. Franklin
Jameson, Editor, Annual Report of the American Historical Association
for the Year 1899, Volume II, Calhoun’s Correspondence: Fourth Annual Report of
the Historical Manuscripts Commission, Correspondence of John C. Calhoun, p.
764-6