Mr. Manning's whole course of conduct, his verbal profession
to the contrary notwithstanding, shows a deep rooted hostility, embittered by
personal pique, to the military government and character of this school. To the
superintendent he seems to have a badly concealed personal, sectional,
political antipathy. I have tried to shut my eyes to this, and to think
differently, but the conviction is irresistible. The sneering tone and manner
in which he said to me last winter, when I submitted to his inspection my draft
of an act for the organization and government of the Seminary as a State
Military Academy, “he is to be a Colonel, is he!" was alone enough to
satisfy me of this, without the one thousand other evidences that he has given.
How inconsistent with the dignity, gravity, caution, and
circumspection which should surround him in his character, as a member of the
Board of Supervisors, is his boasting declaration in the Board, that he had
advised Dr. Vallas orally, and in writing, to disobey an order of the
superintendent, thus striking at the very roots of all government, of any kind
whatever, in the institution! And then telling us that he had that morning
insulted Dr. Vallas for not following his advice.
His added remark that now that he had found he was wrong he
must apologize to Dr. Vallas is no palliation for so total a want of every
attribute becoming a member of the Board of Supervisors. His declaration that
he was ignorant of the existence of the regulation under which the
superintendent issued the order to the professors which he advised Dr. Vallas
to disobey, is no palliation.
It is his duty to know the regulations. He had the
regulations in his possession for more than a month last winter, when he took
advantage of my courtesy and confidence in placing them in his hands for his
perusal, and refused to deliver them up when I wrote to the superintendent to
call on him for them for the purpose of taking them with him to New Orleans. .
. to have printed ready for the use of the school on 1st January last.
So far from apologizing to Dr. Vallas, as he had said in the
Board he should have to do for speaking to him so insultingly as he said he had
done in the forenoon, I am informed by gentlemen who were on the outside of the
hall, that on the night of 31st July that he spoke to both Dr. Vallas and the
superintendent in regard to matters pending before the Board in a most
imperious and dictorial tone and manner, amounting in the whole to a
prohibition to them to take any further step in regard to those matters in
opposition to his wish, although all that they had done was simply in
compliance with instructions to them from the Board of Supervisors. But as Mr.
Manning was not present at the session of the Board at which these instructions
had been given they had not received the imprimatur of his sic volo, sic jubeo.
As to Mr. Manning not understanding the impropriety of his
course towards Dr. Vallas until after he was in the session of the Board on
Tuesday afternoon, he was first met on his arrival there on Monday forenoon by
another professor to whom he expressed his surprise at seeing him in his
uniform. That professor explained to him the authority of the superintendent
for issuing the order to the professors to wear their uniform at the
examination, and the propriety of their doing so. Mr. Manning and myself had
had a similar conversation at his office several days before. So that he
understood the whole thing [before] he met Dr. Vallas, and before he came into
the session of the Board on either Monday or Tuesday afternoons – and it all
only strengthens my conviction that the whole thing was only intended as a
lever with which to impair the authority, influence, and usefulness of the
superintendent with a view to producing as soon as possible a dissolution of
his connection with the institution, and the overturning of its practical,
utilitarian, and military character, and establishing on its ruins a high
sounding program for a grand university of empty halls, for that programme
requires a larger acquaintance with Latin and Greek before a young man can
enter it, than the most of our southwestern young men have acquired when they
leave college.
Dr. Smith has never concealed his opposition to the military
character of this institution, but only relaxed it under the influence of a
conviction of its popularity. He has said openly “it will break down in a year
or two, and then we'll take hold of it and make something out of it.” The
fullest meeting of the Board that we have ever had has after ample discussion,
declared with only two dissenting voices that this shall be "a Literary
and Scientific Institution under a Military System of Government on a Programme
and plan similar to that of the Virginia Military Institute at Lexington.”
The people of the state have sanctioned, and the legislature has ratified it.
Doctor Smith and Mr. Manning have both admitted to me that
they believed it was the popular idea. Is it right in them then – shall they be
permitted to continue to pursue this step-father course towards this
institution of undermining it in this stealthy manner by giving it every side
blow that their position enables them to inflict on it? For I warn gentlemen
now, who desire to maintain the present character of the school, but yet who
may be carried away by other considerations to vote for these measures, that
that will be the inevitable result of them. Let them not then say hereafter
that they would not have voted for them if they had thought that such would be
the result. I tell them now that these are but the entering wedge, blow after
blow on which will be struck, until the present superintendent of the
institution is driven from it, the friends of its present form of government
around this Board either entirely withdrawn, under the influence of that power
behind the throne which is so manifestly anxious to have itself considered
greater than the throne itself, or else reduced to so helpless a minority as to
form no obstacle to the designs of its stepfathers on this institution.
But I have too much confidence in the present governor of
the state not to hope and believe that he will not countenance any measures
calculated to frustrate the wish of the people, or to impair the usefulness to
them of this institution. I claim as much right to speak to and of the present
governor as any other man in the state – all my interests are in it - my
manhood's life has been spent here, my children are born here - what of
property I possess has been acquired here. On another, but in my
estimation inferior, score I claim to stand in that respect on a footing of
perfect equality with any other citizen of the state. I voted to place him in
his present position, and I recommended every other man that I could to do the
same thing. I have known him longer, with one exception, than any other member
of this Board – for thirty-one years I have watched his course with kindly
interest, and there is no man in the state who feels less unpleasantly than I
do at the success and prosperity with which a kind providence has rewarded the
exertion of his energies. I repeat then that I have too much confidence in the
present governor to believe that what I am satisfied are the misguided designs
of Dr. Smith and Mr. Manning in regard to this institution, will meet with his
approbation, and I trust that the members of this Board will not suffer
themselves to be influenced by any outside considerations to vote for measures
of so fatal a tendency to the success and the usefulness of this institution.
SOURCE: Walter L. Fleming, General W.T. Sherman as College
President, p. 266-70