1 General Samuel Houston, senator from Texas,
was mentioned at the time among the Democratic candidates for the Presidency.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 278
1 General Samuel Houston, senator from Texas,
was mentioned at the time among the Democratic candidates for the Presidency.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 278
1 Mr. Bigelow had in a review of Judge Story's
"Life and Letters," in the New York "Evening Post," Jan. 29
and Feb. 4, 1852, disparaged the judge's character as a jurist and author.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, pp. 278-9
Congress and all the
world have a vacation to-day to quaff fresh air, sunshine, and champagne on
board the 'Baltic.'1 I voted for the adjournment, but did not care
to put myself in the great man-trap set especially for members of Congress. I
see nothing certain in the Presidential horizon. In all my meditations I revert
with new regret to the attempted reconciliation in '49 in your State. Without
that we should now control the free States.
1 Of the Collins line of steamships, whose
owners were then seeking a subsidy.
2 On J. Fenimore Cooper, Feb. 25, 1852,
at a meeting of which Mr. Webster was chairman, called to raise funds for a
monument to the novelist. Sumner's reply to the invitation to attend the
meeting is printed in his Works, vol. iii. p. 43.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 279
The post of
assistant secretary of state was offered to my brother; but I
write, not for any public correction of your paper, but merely for your private
information. More than ten days ago Mr. Marcy communicated to me personally his
desire to have my brother in the place, his sense of his fitness beyond that of
any other person in the country, and also the extent to which he was
plagued by applications from persons who would make the office only a
clerkship. My brother was absent from Washington at the time. At the request of
Mr. Marcy I sent for him; and on his arrival, at Mr. Marcy's request, he
reported himself at the state department, was most cordially welcomed, was
assured that not only the secretary but the President desired him to be
assistant secretary, that his knowledge of European affairs was needed, that it
was the intention to raise the salary of the office and to make it a desirable
position. At three different stages of a protracted interview the matter was
thus pressed upon my brother. But in the course of the interview Mr. Marcy
expressed a desire for some confession on the subject of slavery by which my
brother should be distinguished from me, some acceptance of the Baltimore
platform, - all of which he peremptorily declined to do, in a manner that made
Mr. Marcy say to me afterwards that he had behaved in an honorable manner.'
After my brother had fully declared his determination, and his abnegation of
all desire for office, of which I do not speak in detail, the Secretary still
expressed a desire for his services. Subsequently my brother addressed him a
brief note absolutely declining, and in another note recommended the
appointment of Dudley Mann. This affair has got into the newspapers, but by no
suggestion of mine or of my brother.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, pp. 279-80
Kossuth errs, all
err, who ask any intervention by government. Individuals may do as they please,—
stepping to the verge of the law of nations, but the government cannot act.
Depend upon it, you will run against a post if you push that idea. Enthusiast
for freedom, I am for everything practical; but that is not practical.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 271
I do not see our
future on the Presidential question. The recent declaration of Toombs seems
ominous of a break-up, in which I should rejoice. I long to see men who really
think alike on national politics acting together. The Whigs [in Massachusetts]
are in despair. They confess that they are badly beaten. The coalition has been
sustained and its candidate.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 256
I heard of your illness, while I was in New York, with great regret. Time and distance did not allow me to see you at your suburban retreat, although I wished very much to confer with you, particularly on the subject of your letter. Let me say frankly, however, that I despair of any arrangement by which any candidate can be brought out on the Democratic side so as to receive active support from antislavery men. Nor do I see much greater chance on the Whig side. The tendency of both the old parties at present is to national conventions; and in both of these our cause will perish. The material for a separate organization, by which to sustain our principles, seems to exist nowhere except in Massachusetts. Had the Barnburners kept aloof from the Hunkers in 1849, the Democratic split would have been complete throughout the free States, and it would have affected sympathetically the Whig party. A new order of things would have appeared, and the beginning of the end would have been at hand. But the work in some way is to be done over. There will be no peace until the slave-power is subdued. Its tyranny must be overthrown, and freedom, instead of slavery, must become the animating idea of the national government. But I see little chance of any arrangement or combination by which this truly Democratic idea can be promoted in the next Presidential contest.
The politicians are making all their plans to crush us, and they seem to be succeeding so well that all our best energies and most unflinching devotion to principles can alone save us. For myself I see no appreciable difference between Hunker Democracy and Hunker Whiggery: in both, all other questions are lost in the 'single idea' of opposition to the Free Soil sentiment. Nor can I imagine any political success, any party favor or popular reward, which would tempt me to compromise in any respect the independent position which I now hold.
It is vain to try to get rid of this question of the slave-power except by victory over it; and our best course, it seems to me, is to be always ready for the contest. But I am a practical man, and desire to act in such way as best to promote the ideas which we have at heart. If you can show me the road, I am ready to follow. . . The two years before us will be crucial years, years of the Cross. But I know that better times will soon come. For God's sake, stand firm! I hope John Van Buren will not allow himself to be enmeshed in any of the tempting arrangements for mere political success. He is so completely committed to our cause that he can hope for nothing except by its triumph. I know no one who has spoken a stronger or more timely word for us than he has. I am much attached to him personally. I admire his abilities, and am grateful for what he has done; but I feel that if he would surrender himself more unreservedly to the cause he would be more effective still. Few have such powers.
SOURCE: Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 255-6
I would not affect a
feeling which I have not, nor have I any temptation to do it; but I should not
be frank if I did not say to you that I have no personal joy in this election.
Now that the office is in my hands, I feel more than ever a distaste for its
duties and struggles as compared with other spheres. Every heart knoweth its
own secret, and mine has never been in the Senate of the United States, nor is
it there yet. Most painfully do I feel my inability to meet the importance
which has been given to this election and the expectation of enthusiastic
friends. But more than this, I am impressed by the thought that I now embark on
a career which promises to last for six years, if not indefinitely, and which
takes from me all opportunity of study and meditation to which I had hoped to
devote myself. I do not wish to be a politician.
Nothing but
Boutwell's half-Hunkerism prevents us from consolidating a permanent party in
Massachusetts, not by coalition, but by fusion of all who are truly liberal,
humane, and democratic. He is in our way. He has tried to please Hunkers and
Free Soilers. We can get along very well without the Hunkers, and should be
happy to leave Hallett and Co. to commune with the men of State Street. The
latter have been infinitely disturbed by the recent election. For the first
time they are represented in the Senate by one over whom they have no
influence, who is entirely independent, and is a “bachelor!” It was said among
them at first that real estate had gone down twenty-five per cent!
I regret the present
state of things in New York [the absorption of the Barnburners by the
Democratic party, because it seems to interfere with those influences which
were gradually bringing the liberal and antislavery men of both the old parties
together. Your politics will never be in a natural state till this occurs.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 247-8
Seward read the
dispatches which he proposed to send to Mr. Motley,—the first, protesting
against the sending of troops to Mexico by the Austrian Government, the second,
in case they did send, after being thus notified, that he ask for his papers
and withdraw from Vienna.
McCulloch favored
the first paper, but objected to the last; deprecated war under any
circumstances, and even at any time for so worthless a people as the Mexicans.
Stanton was for both. Dennison was most emphatic for both and for maintaining
the Monroe Doctrine. Was ready to fight the European Powers, if they presumed
to interfere with the American states; considered the honor and welfare of the
country involved in this. Speed concurred with McCulloch, Harlan with Dennison.
I suggested it would have been better, and would now be better, to meet the
real party if we were to do anything; that we should take the head of France
rather than the tail of Austria. That I did not mean to object to the measures
marked out by the Secretary of State, which I looked upon as a menace, but that
to fire off an ultimatum to remote Austria, while we had done nothing of the
kind as regards France, whose troops were on our Southwestern frontiers, did
not strike me favorably.
Seward said he was
only waiting Bigelow's dispatches to take the same course towards France, if
she did not recede. Have a telegram this evening from Commander Cooper of the
Winooski that the Ocean Spray had arrived at Eastport with five hundred stand
of arms and asking if he should permit them to land. Within five minutes
Colonel Seward came in with papers from the Secretary of State, consisting of a
note from Sir Frederick Bruce, inclosing two telegrams from Eastport in regard
to arms on the Spray, urging that the arms and the Fenians should not be
permitted to meet. These had been sent to Stanton, who had returned them with a
note [to the effect] that General Meade was on his way to Eastport, but he
disliked to send an order by telegraph, for that would apprize the Fenians of
his coming, and suggesting that the Navy could take some action. Seward wrote
in pencil on the back of the envelope inclosing the papers, that I "could
send orders to restrain action, or another to that effect."
I observe that these
men are very chary about disturbing the Fenians, and I do not care to travel
out of the line of duty to relieve them. I therefore sent word that I was
content to leave the subject with Cooper till to-morrow, when General Meade
would doubtless be at Eastport; if not, the civil authorities were there, with
whom the Navy would coöperate, or whom they could assist.
Speed and Stanton
expressed an opinion, in which others of the Cabinet concurred, that property
once taken and used by the Rebel Government became forfeited to the original
owner and was legal capture. I had so previously decided last fall on the
question of twenty-two rollers and machinery captured at Charlotte and now at
Norfolk.
Thad Stevens yesterday
introduced a resolution directing that three copies of Forney's Chronicle
should be sent to our legations and consuls abroad and be paid for out of the
contingent of the House, — a monstrous proposition made in wanton recklessness
and supported by sixty votes. Forney in return puffs Stevens as the "Great
Commoner."
SOURCE: Gideon
Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and
Johnson, Vol. 2: April 1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, p. 485-7
Whatever may be the
result of our proceedings, I am desirous that you should know my position. I
have never directly or indirectly suggested a desire for the place, or even a
willingness to take it. I shall not generally be believed if I say I do not
desire it. My aims and visions are in other directions, in more quiet fields.
To sundry committees of Hunker Democrats, who have approached me to obtain
pledges and promises with regard to my future course in the State, or in the
Senate if I should go there, I have replied that the office must seek me, and
not I the office, and that it must find me an absolutely independent man. The
Hunkers, Whigs, and Democrats are sweating blood to-day. You perceive that all
the Hunker press, representing Cassism and Websterism, are using every effort
to break up our combination.
SOURCES: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 239
You are right in
auguring ill from the Fabian strategy. When the balloting was postponed for
three days, I thought our friends had lost the chances. My own opinion now is
that they are lost beyond recovery; but others do not share this. The pressure
from Washington has been prodigious. Webster and Cass have both done all they
could. Of course, Boston Whiggery is aroused against me. There were for several
days uneasy stomachs at the chances of my success. It is very evident that a
slight word of promise or yielding to the Hunkers would have secured my
election, it would now if I would give it; but this is impossible. The charge
used with most effect against me is that I am a 'disunionist;' but the authors
of this know its falsehood, — it is all a sham to influence votes. My
principles are, in the words of Franklin, “to step to the verge of the
Constitution to discourage every species of traffic in human flesh.” I am a
constitutionalist and a unionist, and have always been.
SOURCES: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 239-40
Our Free Soil convention was very spirited. The resolutions are pungent,
and cover our original ground. On this we shall stand to the end. I rejoice in
the rent in New York Whiggery. If the Barnburners and Sewardites were together,
there would be a party which would give a new tone to public affairs.
SOURCE: Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner,
Vol. 3, p. 218
1 of the citizens of Boston in 1819 in favor
of the prohibition of slavery in territories and new States. Sumner's letter
was the basis of a leader by Mr. Bigelow in the New York "Evening
Post," May 23, 1850.
2 John A. Dix. Sumner was probably at fault in
this conjecture.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 215-6
1 Samuel A. Eliot, elected to Congress as
successor to Winthrop.
SOURCE: Edward L.
Pierce, Memoir and Letters of Charles Sumner, Vol. 3, p. 217
McCulloch, Stanton,
and Dennison are absent from Washington. Seward read a letter from Bigelow at
Paris, which indicates peace, though all the diplomats here believe a war
inevitable. Seward represents that Montholon was scared out of his wits when
General Logan was appointed to Mexico. He certainly is not a very intelligent
or cultured diplomat. The horizon is not perfectly clear, but the probabilities
are peaceful. Had a talk with the President on the subject of Pasco. Chandler
was the attorney of the Department in this investigation and prosecution at the
Philadelphia Navy Yard, and I had him state the case to the President. He
presented the whole very well, confirming all that I had stated, and making the
case stronger against Pasco. The President was puzzled and avoided any direct
answer. I have little doubt he has been imposed upon and persuaded to do a very
improper thing. But we shall see. This case presents the difficulties to be
surmounted in bringing criminals to justice. Pasco was a public officer, an
active partisan, very popular and much petted by leading party men in official
position. Detected in cheating and stealing, public men for a time thought the
Department was harsh and severe in bringing him to trial. Objections were made
against his being tried by court martial, and he was turned over to the civil
courts. But a trial could not be had. Term after term it was carried along.
Confessions from others implicated and the books and documents produced were so
conclusive that finally he plead guilty and disgorged so far as he was actually
detected. In consequence of his pleading guilty and making restitution of the
amounts clearly ascertained, Judge Cadwalader gave him a mild sentence of only
one year and a half of imprisonment. Having, after a long struggle, reached
this stage, the politicians and the court favoring him, we now have the
President yielding to the pressure of Members of Congress, and, without inquiry
or a call for the records or the facts, pardoning this infamous leader of fraud
and crime. The influence will be pernicious, and scoundrels will be
strengthened. I shall be glad to know that the President has not committed
himself irretrievably.
But little of
importance at the Cabinet. Seward read a letter from Bigelow, Minister at
Paris, representing that indications were that Maximilian would soon leave
Mexico, — had sent to Austria considerable amounts of money, etc. Also read
extracts from a private letter of Prince de Joinville of similar purport. All
of this, I well understood, was intended to counteract a speech of Montgomery
Blair, delivered last Tuesday at Hagerstown, in which he makes an onslaught on
Seward and Stanton, as well as France.
Before we left, and
after all other matters were disposed of, the President brought from the other
room a letter from General Sheridan to General Grant, strongly indorsed by the
latter and both letter and indorsement strongly hostile to the French and
Maximilian. Seward was astounded. McCulloch at once declared that the Treasury
and the country could not stand this nor meet the exigency which another war
would produce. Harlan in a few words sustained McCulloch. Seward was garrulous.
Said if we got in war and drove out the French, we could not get out ourselves.
Went over our war with Mexico. Dennison inquired why the Monroe Doctrine could
not be asserted. Seward said if we made the threat we must be prepared to
maintain it. Dennison thought we might. “How, then,” says Seward, “will you get
your own troops out of the country after driving out the French?” “Why, march
them out,” said Dennison. “Then,” said S., “the French will return."
"We will then,” said D., “expel them again.” I remarked the country was
exhausted, as McCulloch stated, but the popular sentiment was strongly averse
to French occupancy. If the Mexicans wanted an imperial government, no one
would interfere to prevent them, though we might and would regret it, but this
conduct of the French in imposing an Austrian prince upon our neighbors was
very revolting. I hoped, however, we should not be compelled to take the
military view of this question.
Thurlow Weed passed
into the White House as I came upon the portico this morning. I had seen a
person, without recognizing that it was Weed, hurrying forward, as if to be in
advance of me. Following him immediately, I saw who it was and was surprised to
see him, instead of going direct to the stairs, turn square round the bulkhead
and wait until I had passed.
The week has been
one of intense heat, and I have been both busy and indolent. Incidents have
passed without daily record. The President has been ill. On Friday I met him at
the Cabinet. He has been threatened, Dennison tells me, with apoplexy. So the
President informed him.
Mr. Seward has
undertaken to excuse and explain his strange letter to me stating “our vessels
will withhold courtesy from the English.” He was not aware what he wrote. Damns
the English and said he was ready to let them know they must not insult us, and
went into pretty glib denunciation of them. Says the French want to get out of
Mexico and will go if we let them alone. In Cabinet yesterday, Dennison
mentioned a call he had from Sir Frederick Bruce, who desired him to bring to
the notice of the President the grievance of an Englishman. Seward and Stanton
objected to the informality of the proceedings, which should come through the
State Department. The objection was well taken, but Seward could not well
prevent, having been constantly committing irregularities by interfering with
other Departments.
McCulloch is alarmed
about the Treasury. Finds that Fessenden had neither knowledge nor accuracy;
that it would have been as well for the Department and the country had he been
in Maine, fishing, as to have been in the Treasury Department. His opinion of Chase's
financial abilities does not increase in respect as he becomes more conversant
with the finances. But McCulloch, while a business man, and vastly superior to
either of his two immediate predecessors, or both of them, in that respect, has
unfortunately no political experience and is deficient in knowledge of men.
In some exhibits
yesterday, it was shown that the military had had under pay during the year
about one million men daily. Over seven hundred thousand have been paid off and
discharged. There are still over two hundred thousand men on the rolls under
pay. The estimates of Fessenden are exhausted, the loan is limited by law, and
McCulloch is alarmed. His nerves will, however, become stronger, and he can he
will - find ways to weather the storm. Stanton has little idea of economy,
although he parades the subject before the public. It is notorious that no
economy has yet penetrated the War Department. The troops have been reduced in
number, - men have been mustered out, - because from the cessation of
hostilities and the expiration of their terms they could not longer be
retained, but I have not yet seen any attempt to retrench expenses in the
quartermasters', commissary, or any other branch of the military service, -
certainly none in the War Department proper.
On Tuesday the 4th,
I went with Mrs. Welles and Mrs. Bigelow, wife of John B., our minister to
France, to Silver Spring, a pleasant drive. The Blairs, as usual, were
hospitable and interesting. They do not admire Louis Napoleon and want his
troops should be expelled from Mexico. Mrs. B. is joyous, pleasant, and happy,
and it is evident her husband wished her to see and get something of the views
of the Blairs, but, while intelligent and charming, she is not profound on
matters of State, and was a little disconcerted at the plain, blunt remarks of
the elder Mr. and Mrs. Blair. She has, however, a woman's instincts.
Wrote Gilpin, District Attorney at Philadelphia, in answer to his private letter as to prosecution for frauds in Philadelphia Navy Yard.
The papers are publishing the details of the expedition to Wilmington, and disclosing some confidential circumstances which ought not to be made public. One of the Philadelphia editors says the facts were ascertained and given to the press by Osborn of New York, a prowling mercenary correspondent of the newspapers who buys blackmail where he can, and sells intelligence surreptitiously obtained. I wrote to the Secretary of War, giving him the facts for such action as he may be disposed to take. He informed Fox that he would arrest and try by court martial.
Intelligence of the death of Mr. Dayton, our Minister to France, creates some commotion among public men. The event was sudden and his loss will be felt. . . . I had a light and pleasant acquaintance with him when in the Senate some fifteen or eighteen years ago, and we had some correspondence and one or two interviews in the Frémont campaign in 1856, when he was pleased to compliment me, on comparing Connecticut and New Jersey, with having done much to place my own State in a right position. We met again in the spring of 1861. He was a dignified and gentlemanly representative, not a trained diplomat, and unfortunately not acquainted with the language of the French Court. A numerous progeny has arisen at once to succeed him. John Bigelow, consul at Paris, has been appointed Chargé, and I doubt if any other person will be selected who is more fit. Raymond of the Times wants it, but Bigelow is infinitely his superior.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 2: April 1, 1864 — December 31, 1866, p. 205