My corps of sharpshooters marched in front of the line. Left camp at 4 this morning, and at daylight, as General Ewell and staff rode up to us, there was a volley shot at us. We immediately deployed and after the enemy. We fought on a run for six hours, all the time the enemy falling back. They at one time raised a white flag and surrendered. We then stopped firing, and as we got within one hundred feet they opened on us again, for they saw we were only a line of sharpshooters. We then resumed firing at them. I captured a mail-bag in the fight, and in several letters I found some money. We halted, and the enemy kept on running like wild ducks. This is the battle of Bristow Station. We took many prisoners. As we got through fighting we heard firing on our right. We marched to their support, but when we got there the firing had ceased. Twenty-five miles to-day. We camped on Manassas Plain. Raining hard all night.
Showing posts with label Captured Mail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Captured Mail. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 4, 2023
Diary of Private Louis Leon: October 14, 1863
SOURCE: Louis Leon, Diary of a Tar Heel
Confederate Soldier, p. 50
Sunday, January 27, 2019
John M. Forbes, writing from London, after June 9, 1863
Among my London acquaintances was Mr. Edward Ellis, a member
of Parliament himself, and, I think, with one or two sons also in that body. He
was a friend and adherent of Palmerston, and, having a pecuniary interest in
land on this side, was supposed to be very well posted about American affairs.
It was just at the time the controversy was going on about the letter-bag of a
steamer; it had been seized with the vessel, carrying a cargo of munitions of
war, nominally to Mexico, but undoubtedly intended for the Texan rebels. The
bag must have contained proof of this, but, being under the seals of the
British post-office, was claimed by the British minister as sacred, and the
dispute was going on as to what should be done with it; the condemnation of the
vessel and cargo, amounting to a very large sum, depending a great deal upon
the result. I was dining at Mr. Ellis's, and while we were standing before the
fire, waiting for dinner to be announced, two or three of the younger members
of Parliament came in and announced the “good news” that the letter-bags had
been given up without being opened, which removed the danger of a rupture in
the friendly relations between the United States and Great Britain. This was
all very polite, Mr. Adams being present, and, as usual, silent. I could not
help, however, saying a word to this effect: “I am very glad you like the news;
but I hope you will remember one thing, that you are making a precedent which,
in the long future, we intend to follow. You are now ready to introduce all
possible privileges for neutrals in the carrying trade, but in the long run
Great Britain is at war ten years while we are likely to be one; and whatever
precedent you set now, we shall hold you to.”
*~*~*~*
Among the notable men that I met was an Hon. Mr. Berkeley, a
queer little old man, who was known in Parliament as “single speech Berkeley,”
and who every year brought up some radical proposition which was good-naturedly
received and passed over, out of regard for his aristocratic connections and
influence. I sat next him at a dinner given me by Captain Blakely, the
gunmaker, and, with the usual reserve which I had to maintain in that hostile
atmosphere, I said very little except upon general subjects; but as we were
putting on our coats before going off, little Mr. Berkeley shook hands with me
very warmly and said, “I hope you understand that I am entirely with you in
your fight to put down the slaveholders.”
*~*~*~*
General Forbes was a very good-looking, middle-aged man at
that time, and was very polite to me, taking me down to Aldershot to see a
review of the British volunteers. We lunched with the mess, and then went to
the field, where there was a great display of troops, and where I saw many
celebrities of the Crimean war and the Indian mutiny. The review wound up with
a sham fight, in the midst of which I had to start by cab to catch the train
back to London to keep an engagement in the evening. The cabman at first
refused to cross the field of battle, but under bribe or threat I managed to
get him down to run the gauntlet of the advancing line, going between them and
their objective point with the horse on the jump and the whole line apparently
firing at us. It had all the effect of a real battle, — except the lead.
*~*~*~*
One project which we thought of at this time might have
turned into great results if the Mexicans had had any minister or recognized
agent in London. They were at open war with France, and it occurred to us that,
if they would do towards France exactly what the rebel cruisers were doing against
us, we should bring the European powers to a realizing sense of their misdeeds
towards us. We discussed the question, and thought of lending to Mexico a few
thousand dollars out of our resources to enable them to fit out cruisers in
English ports to go into the Channel and destroy French ships, and to return to
British ports to coal and recruit and get ready for other depredations; in fact
repeating what was being done in British neutral ports against the United
States. If some morning a Mexican cruiser had put into Plymouth after
destroying a lot of French ships, the replies of the British Foreign Secretary
to a powerful, warlike nation like France would have been very different from
what they were saying to us, hampered as we were with our internal war; and, if
they had treated France as they did us, war would have been the consequence in
about twenty-four hours. But there was no Mexican minister or agent, and we
could do nothing.
*~*~*~*
We were surprised at the house by being decorated in most
wonderful crape round our hats, a heavy silk scarfs reaching almost to our
feet, which were put over us by one of the servants, as we were to play the
part of chief mourners. After the religious ceremonies at the house, we were
ushered into carriages decorated in the same wonderful manner, and slowly drove
through the streets, guarded by a lot of mutes in deep black, carrying halberds
or poles behind the hearse. It looked as if they were guarding us to prevent
our escape, as they walked along beside the carriage. After a dreary ride we
came to the suburban cemetery and then left the carriages and surveyed the
scene. The hearse was the principal object, being drawn by black horses and
having tall, black plumes on each side. As we were waiting for it to come up,
Mr. B., who was sincerely attached to his wife, but had a sense of humor, could
not forbear a sort of apology, saying that he had tried to have it as private
and inconspicuous as possible, but it was impossible to get away from the conventionality
and pomp of a London funeral: he wished that the hearse could be transported to
America and put at the head of the Union army; he was sure the rebels would be
routed at once by its appearance! After a short service at the grave, Mr.
Baring and I jumped into his cab, throwing off our insignia of mourning, which
must have formed a valuable perquisite, — there being silk enough to make a
cassock of, — and were soon driving rapidly to London.
*~*~*~*
During our stay in London we went to hear Mr. Cobden's great
speech in the Commons. The House of Commons is a very different affair from our
House of Representatives; indeed, it looks, at first sight, much more like one
of our large committee rooms at the Capitol, or perhaps like the senate chamber
there. Only a few strangers are admitted to what is called the speaker's
gallery, and then only by special ticket from the speaker. When Cobden's speech
was expected, considerable influence had to be used to get admittance. We
learned that the speaker had in this case, when applied to, expressed fears
that the two factions of Union and rebel (unrecognized) emissaries might be placed
too near each other, and so we found much diplomacy had been expended in
arranging seats to keep ourselves and Messrs. Mason and Slidell separated. The
occasion was certainly a very memorable one, for Cobden's speech rang through
Europe and America, and materially influenced the action of the English
government. His manner was cold and somewhat hesitating, but he spoke with
great force and sense, not mincing his phrases, against the backslidings of his
countrymen; and his speech was all the more effective from his taking the stand
for us, not (as Bright usually did) from an American point of view, but because
he saw England's honor and interest imperiled by the short-sighted policy of
Palmerston and Russell.
I think it was on the same night that Roebuck made a most
malignant attack upon what he called the barbarism of the Federals in their
cruel and atrocious proclamation of emancipation, “stimulating the subordinate
race to make war against their superiors, and putting a premium on murder,
rape, and robbery.” Monckton Milnes, the poet, whom I have since welcomed here
as Lord Houghton, made a very pithy and spirited rejoinder to this diatribe,
and quite won my heart.
*~*~*~*
We had come, also, prepared to do something in the way of
enlightening the British public as to the real strength of the North, and the
certainty of our ultimate success, but Mr. Adams thought it doubtful whether
such a course would be wise; for if successful in our argument it might show
the governing class in Europe that their only chance for breaking up the Union
was in active interference; so that he thought it safer for them to be kept
neutral by the belief that we were sure to break up.
*~*~*~*
I was requested to lead in to dinner his daughter-in-law,
the wife of Mr. Nassau John Senior, who was very pleasant; but, knowing nothing
about her, I refrained from talking upon any interesting subject, until she
happened to say that her brother had just returned from France, and that she
hoped I would see him. I then had to ask who her brother was, and found it was
Tom Hughes. “Why,” said I, “he is the one man I wanted to see; I thought he was
ill, and that I should go home without seeing him.” I was going to start in a
few days for Liverpool, and she very warmly insisted that I should see her
brother, and accordingly asked him for an appointment. When I called at his
office in Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, I found my good friend Tom Hughes, genial
and pleasant as he is to-day. I need hardly say that the remainder of my
evening with Mrs. Senior at the dinner party was very much more delightful than
at the beginning, as it was like finding a warm friend in the midst of an
enemy's camp.
SOURCE: Sarah Forbes Hughes, Letters and
Recollections of John Murray Forbes, Volume 2, p. 31-8
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Diary of Gideon Welles: Monday, January 18, 1864
A batch of letters
has been sent us from the provost marshal, disclosing a mass of fraud and
intrigue on the part of a set of assuming men that is as amusing as reckless.
General Haupt, Naval Constructor Griffiths, Gwyn[?] of the Treasury, Hamilton
Norris, and others figure in the affair. About a year since General H.
published a series of questions for the improvement and progress of the Navy
Department, which he and his associates appeared inclined to take into their
keeping. This correspondence brings to light the secret intrigues of these
scoundrels.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 511
Friday, March 9, 2018
Diary of Gideon Welles: December 24, 1863
I had a brief talk with Chase on certain financial matters,
and gave him copies of some Rebel correspondence, — extracts of letters from
young Lamar, showing that ——, of the firm of —— & —— is in league with
certain traitors. Chase professed to have some previous knowledge of a similar
character, but did not indicate wherein and I was not satisfied he had any
information whatever on this matter. It is a weakness with him, — as if he
wished others to believe him omniscient, or that no one else should know of
matters relating to his Department which he does not possess.
The laws, he said, are not sufficiently stringent. He hoped
Congress would pass some severe enactments on the subject of trading in gold. “Why
not,” I asked, “trade in gold as well as iron? Our depreciated currency has
made gold merchandise, to be bought and sold, not a standard of value.” I had
but little time and no disposition for controversy. These ideas of forbidding,
restricting, and regulating trade in gold and silver when Government has made
the currency legal tender by law, are so absurd, and so repugnant to all my
opinions and convictions, that I had no patience to listen to the remarks of a
Secretary of the Treasury, the financial officer of the Government, a man of
his professed principles, when I had anything else to do. I therefore left him
abruptly.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles, Secretary
of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30, 1864, p.
493-4
Wednesday, March 7, 2018
Diary of Gideon Welles: Tuesday, December 22, 1863
Only Seward and myself were with the President at
Cabinet-meeting. Seward is highly pleased with the course taken in regard to
the captured letters. Wanted me to send him all of Trowbridge's which had not
been published. I did so. He gave me a long confidential conversation about
Mexican affairs which had been communicated by Mr. Corwin,1 our
Minister, under the strongest injunctions of secrecy. Before he got through,
however, Seward let out that he had read the dispatch to Lord Lyons, and I
think said he let Lord L. take it; assumed that Earl Russell, on learning the
facts, would not feel more amiably disposed towards the French.
_______________
1 Thomas Corwin.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 493
Monday, March 5, 2018
Diary of Gideon Welles: Monday, December 21, 1863
Wrote Commodore
Wilkes that his denial was not sufficiently explicit; that innocent parties
were implicated in the publication of his letter, which was, he well knew, a
breach of regulations as well as of faith, and the imputation resting upon them
must be removed; that either the Department or he must have authorized or at
least permitted the publication; that the Department or any connected with it
would have no object in a surreptitious publication; that I was confident no
one of the two or three clerks who were cognizant of the letter had been
guilty, though his denial threw the act on them. If Wilkes, or some of his
household avowed the act, it will relieve them. If shrewd he will do it or have
it done, for he is in a dilemma; but no prompting of truth, or candor, or sense
of right to the clerks or others will influence him.
I received a large
budget of Rebel letters captured on board the Ceres. Faxon examined and
arranged them for publication. An exposure of some which I have read will have
a good effect.
Returning from an
early evening walk, I learned Stanton had called for me, and I went at once to
the War Department. Seward and Chase were with him. Stanton read to me a letter
which had been written in cipher, but which after two days' labor the experts
had unlocked with the exception of a few words. Mention was made of “carrying
out the programme” and the intention to seize two steamers. Certain allusions
to Briggs, Cavnach, with a conviction on the part of Stanton that the letter
was from Trowbridge,1 and also other points and names struck me as
not entirely unfamiliar. The trio had become puzzled, and Stanton called on me
to assist, or hear my suggestions. They had come to the conclusion and were
confident the “programme” was to seize one or more of the California steamers,
and asked about gunboats. I did not entirely concur in their conclusions and
told them the letters captured on the Ceres would furnish some light in regard
to the persons alluded to, especially Trowbridge, Briggs, and C.; that I had
not read the letters, but parts of several had been read to me and their
publication would have a good effect; that they were with the Chief Clerk of
the Navy Department, who was to copy and publish portions of them. If, however,
Trowbridge was to be arrested, it might be best to suspend publication for the
present.
There was a general
wish to see the correspondence, and we agreed to meet at 8 P.M. for that
purpose. In the mean time I was to send to Faxon to be on hand with the
letters. When we met at eight, Faxon proceeded to read them. Those from
Trowbridge to young Lamar2 made some singular disclosures, and one
of them made mention of a nephew of William H. Seward as being concerned in a
cargo for running the blockade. This disturbed Seward more than I should have
supposed, — for it was not asserted as a fact, — and if, as he remarked, there
were among twenty or thirty nephews one traitor it would not be strange. It was
thought best to stop the publication. I proposed that a portion — all, indeed,
but the letters of Trowbridge and one of Frank Smith of Memphis — should be
made public, confident the effect would be good. But I was overruled by the
others, and Faxon was sent off to stop the publication. He was too late,
however, for a portion of them had already been printed.
Telegrams were sent
to Marshal Murray at New York to arrest Trowbridge forthwith, and hold him in
close custody, and to Admiral Paulding to place a gunboat in the Narrows and at
Throg's Neck to stop all outward-bound steamers that have not a pass.
_______________
1 N. C. Trowbridge, of New York.
2 Col. C. A. L. Lamar, who had been a
Confederate Agent in England.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 491-3
Monday, July 10, 2017
Diary of John Beauchamp Jones: June 2, 1863
We have a dispatch from Mississippi, stating that on
Thursday last Grant demanded the surrender of Vicksburg in three days. He was
answered that fifteen minutes were not asked; that the men were ready to die — but
would never surrender. This was followed by another assault, in which the enemy
lost great numbers, and were repulsed — as they have been in every subsequent
attempt to take the town.
A letter from our agent in London says H. O. Brewer, of Mobile,
advanced £10,000 in March last, to buy a steamer for the use of the Confederate
States.
Gen. Whiting writes from Wilmington, that a captured mail
furnishes the intelligence that the enemy have thirty-one regiments at Newbern,
and he apprehends they will cut the railroad at Goldsborough, as we have but
two small brigades to resist them. Then they may march against Wilmington,
where he has not now sufficient forces to man his batteries. The general says
he is quite sure that individual blockade-runners inform the enemy of our
defenseless points, and inflict incalculable injury. He desires the Secretary
to lay his letter before the President.
A circular from the Bureau of Conscription to the
commandants of conscripts says, the Assistant Secretary of War (Judge Campbell)
suggests that overseers and managers on farms be disturbed as little as
possible just at this time, for the benefit of the crops. But what good will
the crops do, if we be subjugated in the mean time? I thought every man was
needed, just at this time, on the field of battle.
The President rides out (on horse) every afternoon, and sits
as straight as an English king could do four centuries ago.
SOURCE: John Beauchamp Jones, A Rebel War Clerk's
Diary at the Confederate States Capital, Volume 1, p. 338-9
Friday, May 12, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Thursday, June 18, 1863
I find
that Fox, whom I authorized to telegraph to the Commandant of the Yards the
other night to get off immediately vessels after the pirate Tacony, amplified
the order, and that a very large number of vessels are being chartered or
pressed into the service. While it was necessary to have some, there is such a
thing as overdoing, but the order having gone out in my name, I could not
contest it.
Have information that Admiral Foote is quite ill at the
Astor House, New York. He came on from New Haven to New York, expecting to take
the Tuscarora on Monday for Port Royal, but that vessel had been dispatched
after the pirate Tacony. This disappointment, the excitement, over-exertion,
and domestic anxiety and affliction have probably had an effect on his
sensitive and nervous mind. He told me with some emotion, when last here, that
his wife's health was such it would detain him a few days to make certain
indispensable arrangements, for their parting would be final, she could not be
expected to live till he returned.
Wrote Seward that the condition of affairs on the Rio Grande
and at Matamoras was unsatisfactory. We have had several conversations on the
subject, in which I have tried to convince him of the injury done by the
unrestricted trade and communication on that river, and to persuade him that he
could make his mark and do a great public service by procuring to be
established a principle in regard to the right of adjoining nations, like the
United States and Mexico, and the occupancy of a mutual highway like the Rio
Grande, with the necessary authority to enforce a blockade, — questions that
have never yet been decided and settled among nations. Our blockade is rendered
in a great degree ineffective because we cannot shut off traffic and mail
facilities, or exclude commercial and postal intercourse with the Rebels via
the Rio Grande. An immense commerce has suddenly sprung up, nominally with
Matamoras, but actually with Texas and the whole Southwest, nay, with the
entire Rebel region, for letters are interchanged between Richmond and England
by that route.
There are one or two hundred vessels off the mouth of the
Rio Grande, where there were never more than six or eight before the War, nor
will there be more than a dozen when the War is over. English merchant
adventurers are establishing regular lines with Matamoras, of which the
Peterhoff was one, carrying supplies and mails to the Rebels and receiving
cotton in return. Unfortunately, Mr. Seward has given encouragement to them, by
conceding the sanctity of captured mails, which, with the evidence which would
insure condemnation, are to be forwarded unopened to their destination. In no
respect, way, or manner does the Secretary of State furnish a correction by
assisting or proposing a principle to be recognized by nations, or by any
arrangement with Mexico, or France, or both.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 333-5
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Thursday, May 28, 1863
I this morning got hold of the pamphlet of Sir Vernon
Harcourt, “Historicus,” and am delighted to find a coincidence of views between
him and myself on the subject of mails captured on vessels running the
blockade, or carrying contraband. He warns his countrymen that “the danger is not that Americans will
concede too little but that Great Britain may accept too much.” This
is a mortifying, humiliating fact, the more so from its truth. Mr. Seward is
not aware of what he is doing, and the injustice and dishonor he is inflicting
on his country by his concession. It is lamentable that the President is misled
in these matters, for Mr. Seward is tampering and trifling with national
rights. I have no doubt he acted inconsiderately and ignorantly of any wrong in
the first instance when he took upon himself to make these extraordinary and
disgraceful concessions, but, having become involved in error, he has studied,
not to enlighten himself and serve the country, but to impose upon and mislead
the President in order to extricate himself.
Dahlgren to-day broached the subject of operations against
Charleston. He speaks of it earnestly and energetically. Were it not so that
his assignment to that command would cause dissatisfaction, I would, as the President
strongly favors him, let him show his ability as an officer in his legitimate
professional duty. He would enter upon the work intelligently and with a
determination to be successful. Whether he has the skill, power, and ability of
a first-rate naval commander is yet to be tested. He has the zeal, pride, and
ambition, but there are other qualities in which he may be deficient.
Brown of the wrecked Indianola and Fontané of the burnt
Mississippi, each called on me to-day. They were both captured last February,
have been exchanged, and arrived to-day from Richmond. Their accounts
correspond with each other and with what we have previously heard in regard to
the deplorable state of things in the Rebel region. Poor beef three times a
week and corn bread daily were dealt to them. The white male population was all
away. The railroads are in a wretched condition, the running-stock worse than
the roads.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 315-6
Monday, April 3, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Saturday, May 23, 1863
Met the President, Stanton, and Halleck at the War
Department. Fox was with me. Neither Du Pont nor General Hunter has answered
the President's dispatch to them a month since. Halleck does not favor an
attack on Charleston unless by the Navy. The army will second, so far as it
can. Fox, who commanded the first military expedition to Sumter, is for a
renewed attack, and wants the Navy to take the brunt. Stanton wants the matter
prosecuted. I have very little confidence in success under the present admiral.
It is evident that Du Pont is against doing anything, — that he is demoralizing
others, and doing no good in that direction. If anything is to be done, we must
have a new commander. Du Pont has talents and capability, but we are to have
the benefit of neither at Charleston. The old army infirmity of this war,
dilatory action, affects Du Pont. Commendation and encouragement, instead of
stimulating him, have raised the mountain of difficulty higher daily. He is
nursing Du Pont, whose fame he fears may suffer, and has sought sympathy by
imparting his fears and doubts to his subordinates, until all are impressed
with his apprehensions. The capture of Charleston by such a chief is an
impossibility, whatever may be accomplished by another. This being the case, I have
doubts of renewing the attack immediately, notwithstanding the zeal of Stanton
and Fox. I certainly would not without some change of officers. Having no
faith, the commander can accomplish no work. In the struggle of war, there must
sometimes be risks to accomplish results, but it is clear we can expect no
great risks from Du Pont at Charleston. The difficulties increase daily [as]
his imagination dwells on the subject. Under any circumstances we shall be
likely to have trouble with him. He has remarkable address, is courtly, the
head of a formidable clique, the most formidable in the Navy, loves intrigue,
is Jesuitical, and I have reason to believe is not always frank and sincere. It
was finally concluded to delay proceedings until the arrival of General
Gillmore, who should be put in possession of our views.
Sumner brought me this P.M. a report in manuscript of the
case of the Peterhoff mail. I have read it and notice that the attorney,
Delafield Smith, takes the opportunity to say, I doubt not at whose suggestion,
that there is no report that the public mails have ever been opened and examined.
He does not say there is any report they were not, or that there is any report
whatever on the subject. All letters and papers deemed necessary are always
examined. Upton well said in reply to Smith that the question had never been
raised. Much time was spent in arguing this point respecting the mails. It was
reported to Seward, and that point was seized upon, and the question raised,
which led the President to call on me for a record of a case where public mails
had been searched. Seward's man, Delafield Smith, having learned through
Archibald, the British Consul, that the Secretary of State had given up our
undoubted right to search the mails, set up the pettifogging pretense that
there was no report that captured mails ever had been examined, which Judge
Betts did not regard, and Upton correctly said the point had never been raised.
The court never asked permission of the Executive to try a prize case; there is
no report that they ever asked or did not ask; the right was no more questioned
than the right to search the mails.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 309-10
Thursday, March 30, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Tuesday, May 19, 1863
The case of Vallandigham, recently arrested by General
Burnside, tried by court martial, convicted of something, and sentenced to Fort
Warren, was before the Cabinet. It was an error on the part of Burnside. All
regretted the arrest, but, having been made, every one wished he had been sent
over the lines to the Rebels with whom he sympathizes. Until the subject is
legitimately before us, and there is a necessity to act, there is no disposition
to meddle with the case.
The New York Tribune of to-day has a communication on
the Peterhoff mail question. It is neither so good nor so bad as it might have
been. Am sorry to see it just at this time, and uncertain as to the author.
Faxon names one of the correspondents of the Tribune, but while he may
have forwarded the article he could not have written it.
Governor Sprague and Miss Kate Chase called this evening. I
have been skeptical as to a match, but this means something. She is beautiful,
or, more properly perhaps, interesting and impressive. He is rich and holds the
position of Senator. Few young men have such advantages as he, and Miss Kate
has talents and ambition sufficient for both.
I wrote and sent to Senator Sumner a denial of John Laird's
statement in the British House of Commons. When he asserted that the Secretary
of the American Navy, or the agent of the Secretary, applied to him to build
vessels, or a vessel, he asserted what is not true, what he knows to be untrue.
He is, in my opinion, a mercenary hypocrite without principle or honesty, as
his words and works both show.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 306
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Friday, May 15, 1863
The President called on me this morning with the basis of a
dispatch which Lord Lyons proposed to send home. He had submitted it to Mr.
Seward, who handed it to the President, and he brought it to me. The President
read it to me, and when he concluded, I remarked the whole question of the
mails belonged properly to the courts and I thought unless we proposed some new
treaty arrangement it would be best the subject should continue with the courts
as law and usage directed. “But,” he inquired, “have the courts ever opened the
mails of a neutral government?” I replied, “Always, when the captured vessels
on which mails were found were considered good prize.” “Why, then,” said he, “do
you not furnish me with the fact? It is what I want, but you furnish me with no
report that any neutral has ever been searched.” I said I was not aware that
the right had ever been questioned. The courts made no reports to me whether
they opened or did not open mail. The courts are independent of the
Departments, to which they are not amenable. In the mails was often the best
and only evidence that could insure condemnation. [I said] that I should as
soon have expected an inquiry whether evidence was taken, witnesses sworn, and
the cargoes examined as whether mails were examined. “But if mails ever are
examined,” said he, “the fact must be known and recorded. What vessels,” he
asked, “have we captured, where we have examined the mails?” “All, doubtless,
that have had mails on board,” I replied. Probably most of them were not
intrusted with mails. “What,'” asked he, '”was the first vessel taken?” “I do
not recollect the name, a small blockade-runner, I think; I presume she had no
mail. If she had, I have no doubt the court searched it and examined all
letters and papers.” He was extremely anxious to ascertain if I recollected, or
knew that any captured mail had been searched. I told him I remembered no
specific mention, doubted if the courts ever reported to the Navy Department.
Foreign governments, knowing of the blockade, would not be likely to make up
mails for the ports blockaded. The Peterhoff had a mail ostensibly for
Matamoras, which was her destination, but with a cargo and mails which we knew
were intended for the Rebels, though the proof might be difficult since the
mail had been given up. I sent for Watkins, who has charge of prize matters, to
know if there was any record or mention of mails in any of the papers sent the
Navy Department, but he could not call to mind anything conclusive. Some
mention was made of mails or dispatches in the mail on board the Bermuda, which
we captured, but it was incidental. Perhaps the facts might be got from the
district attorneys, though he thought, as I did, that but few regular mails
were given to blockade-runners. The President said he would frame a letter to
the district attorneys, and in the afternoon he brought in a form to be sent to
the attorneys in Philadelphia, New York, and Boston.
Read Chase the principal points in the Peterhoff case. He
approved of my views, concurred in them fully, and said there was no getting
around them.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 302-4
Thursday, March 23, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Wednesday, May 13, 1863
The last arrival from England brings Earl Russell's speech
on American affairs. Its tone and views are less offensive than some things we
have had, and manifest a dawning realization of what must follow if England
persists in her unfriendly policy. In his speech, Earl R., in some remarks
relative to the opinions of the law officers of the Crown on the subject of
mails captured on blockade-runners, adroitly quotes the letter of Seward to me
on the 31st of October, and announces that to be the policy of the United
States Government, and the regulation which governs our naval officers. It is
not the English policy, nor a regulation which they adopt, reciprocate, or
respect, but the tame, flat concession of the Secretary of State, made without
authority or law. The statement of Earl R. is not correct. No such orders as he
represents have issued from the Navy Department. Not a naval officer or
district attorney has ever been instructed to surrender the mails as stated, nor
is there a court in the United States which would regard such instructions, if
given, as good law. It is nothing more nor less than an attempted abandonment,
an ignominious surrender, of our undoubted legal rights by a Secretary of State
who knew not what he was about. The President may, under the influence of Mr.
Seward, commit himself to this inconsiderate and illegal proceeding and direct
such instructions to be issued, but if so, the act shall be his, not mine, and
he will find it an unhappy error.
But Seward has been complimented in Parliament for giving
away to our worst enemy his country's rights, — for an impertinent and improper
intermeddling, or attempt to intermeddle, with and direct the action of another
Department, and the incense which he has received will tickle his vanity.
Sumner tells me of a queer interview he had with Seward. The
first part of the conversation was harmonious and related chiefly to the shrewd
and cautious policy and management of the British Ministry, who carefully referred
all complex questions to the law officers of Her Majesty's Government. It might
have been a hint to Seward to be more prudent and considerate, and to take
legal advice instead of pushing on, wordy and slovenly, as is sometimes done.
Allusion was made to Mr. Adams and his unfortunate letter to Zerman.1
Our Minister, Mr. Adams, was spoken of as too reserved and retiring for his own
and the general good. Sumner said, in justification and by way of excuse for
him, that it would be pleasanter and happier for him if he had a Secretary of
Legation whose deportment, manner, and social position were different, — if he
were more affable and courteous, in short more of a gentleman, — for he could
in that case make up for some of Mr. A.'s deficiencies. At this point Seward
flew into a passion, and, in a high key, told Sumner he knew nothing of
political (meaning party) claims and services, and accused him of a design to cut
the throat of Charley Wilson, the Secretary of Legation at London. Sumner
wholly disclaimed any such design or any personal knowledge of the man, but
said he had been informed, and had no doubt of the fact, that it was the daily
practice of Wilson to go to Morley's, seat himself in a conspicuous place,
throw his legs upon the table, and, in coarse language, abuse England and the
English. Whatever might be our grievances and wrong, this, Sumner thought, was
not a happy method of correcting them, nor would such conduct on the part of
the second officer of the Legation bring about kinder feelings or a better
state of things, whereas a true gentleman could by suavity and dignity in such
a position win respect, strengthen his principal, and benefit the country.
These remarks only made Seward more violent, and louder in his declarations
that Charley Wilson was a clever fellow and should be sustained.
I read to Attorney-General Bates the letters and papers in
relation to mails on captured vessels, of which he had some previous knowledge.
He complimented my letters and argument, and said my position was impregnable
and the Secretary of State wholly and utterly wrong.
Mr. Seward sent me to-day a letter from Lord Lyons
concerning the Mont Blanc and the Dolphin, and wished me to name some person at
Key West to arbitrate on the former case, the vessel having been restored and
the parties wanting damages. I named Admiral Bailey for this naval duty, but
took occasion to reiterate views I have heretofore expressed, and especially in
my letter yesterday that these matters belonged to the courts and not to the
Departments.
Hear of no new move by Hooker. I am apprehensive our loss in
killed and prisoners was much greater in the late battle than has been
supposed.
_______________
1 Zerman was a Mexican in partnership with Howell, an
American.
The firm fitted out a vessel to trade with Matamoras. Mr.
Adams, being satisfied of their good faith, gave them assurances of immunity
from interference on the part of the United States Navy, and this
discrimination against Englishmen engaged ostensibly in the same trade, was
sharply criticized in the British Parliament.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 299-302
Saturday, March 11, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Friday, May 1, 1863
After Cabinet-meeting walked over with Attorney-General
Bates to his office. Had a very full talk with him concerning the question of
captured mails, — the jurisdiction of the courts, the law, and usage, and
rights of the Government. He is unqualifiedly with me in my views and
principles, — the law and our rights. He dwelt with some feeling on the
courtesy which ought to exist between the several Departments and was by them
generally observed. Although cautious and guarded in his remarks, he did not
conceal his dissatisfaction with the conduct of the Secretary of State in
writing to attorneys and marshals, and assuming to instruct and direct them in
their official duties which were assigned to and required by law to be done by
the Attorney-General. We are getting vague rumors of army operations, but
nothing intelligible or reliable.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 290
Friday, March 10, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Thursday, April 30, 1863
To-day has been designated for a National Fast. I listened
to a patriotic Christian discourse from my pastor, Mr. Pyne.
Had a long, studied, complaining letter from Admiral Du
Pont, of some twenty pages, in explanation and refutation of a letter in the Baltimore
American, which criticizes and censures his conduct at Charleston. The
dispatch is no credit to Du Pont, who could be better employed. He is evidently
thinking much more of Du Pont than of the service or the country. I fear he can
be no longer useful in his present command, and am mortified and vexed that I
did not earlier detect his vanity and weakness. They have lost us the
opportunity to take Charleston, which a man of more daring energy and who had
not a distinguished name to nurse and take care of would have improved. All Du
Pont's letters since the 8th show that he had no heart, no confidence, no zeal
in his work; that he went into the fight with a predetermined conviction it
would not be a success. He is prejudiced against the monitor class of vessels,
and would attribute his failure to them, but it is evident he has no taste for
rough, close fighting.
Senator Sumner called on me this P.M. in relation to the
coast defense of Massachusetts. I received a letter from Governor Andrew this A.M.
on the same subject. The President had also been to see me in regard to it.
After disposing of that question, Sumner related an
interesting conversation which he had last evening with Lord Lyons at
Tassara's, the Spanish Minister. I was an hour or two at Tassara's party, in
the early part of the evening, and observed S. and Lord L. in earnest
conversation. Sumner says their whole talk was on the subject of the mails on
captured vessels. He opened the subject by regretting that in the peculiar
condition of our affairs, Lord Lyons should have made a demand that could not
be yielded without national dishonor; said that the question was one of
judicature rather than diplomacy. Lord Lyons disavowed ever having made a
demand; said he was cautious and careful in all his transactions with Mr.
Seward, that he made it a point to reduce all matters with Seward of a public
nature to writing, that he had done so in regard to the mail of the Peterhoff,
and studiously avoided any demand. He authorized Sumner, who is Chairman of
Foreign Relations, to see all his letters in relation to the mails, etc., etc.
To-day Sumner saw the President and repeated to him this
conversation, Lord Lyons having authorized him to do so. The President, he
says, seemed astounded, and after some general conversation on the subject,
said in his emphatic way, “I shall have to cut this knot.”
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 288-9
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Tuesday, April 28, 1863
Nothing at Cabinet, Seward and Chase absent. The President
engaged in selecting provost marshals.
Sumner called this evening at the Department. Was much
discomfited with an interview which he had last evening with the President. The
latter was just filing a paper as Sumner went in. After a few moments Sumner
took two slips from his pocket, — one cut from the Boston Transcript, the
other from the Chicago Tribune, each taking strong ground against
surrendering the Peterhoff mail. The President, after reading them, opened the
paper he had just filed and read to Sumner his letter addressed to the
Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Navy. He told Sumner he had
received the replies and just concluded reading mine. After some comments on
them he said to Sumner, “I will not show these papers to you now; perhaps I
never shall.” A conversation then took place which greatly mortified and
chagrined Sumner, who declares the President is very ignorant or very deceptive.
The President, he says, is horrified, or appeared to be, with the idea of a war
with England, which he assumed depended on this question. He was confident we
should have war with England if we presumed to open their mail bags, or break
their seals or locks. They would not submit to it, and we were in no condition
to plunge into a foreign war on a subject of so little importance in comparison
with the terrible consequences which must follow our act. Of this idea of a war
with England, Sumner could not dispossess him by argument, or by showing its
absurdity. Whether it was real or affected ignorance, Sumner was not satisfied.
I have no doubts of the President's sincerity, and so told
Sumner. But he has been imposed upon, humbugged, by a man in whom he confides.
His confidence has been abused; he does not — frankly confesses he does not —
comprehend the principles involved nor the question itself. Seward does not
intend he shall comprehend it. While attempting to look into it, the Secretary
of State is daily, and almost hourly, wailing in his ears the calamities of a
war with England which he is striving to prevent. The President is thus led
away from the real question, and will probably decide it, not on its merits,
but on this false issue, raised by the man who is the author of the difficulty.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 286-7
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Monday, April 27, 1863
Finished and gave to the President my letter on the subject
of mails on captured vessels. It has occupied almost every moment of my time
for a week, aided by Eames, Watkins, and Upton, and by suggestions from Sumner,
who has entered earnestly into the subject.
The President was alone when I called on him with the
document, which looked formidable, filling thirty-one pages of foolscap. He was
pleased and interested, not at all discouraged by my paper; said he should read
every word of it, that he wanted to understand the question, etc. He told me
Seward had sent in his answer this morning, but it was in some respects not
satisfactory, particularly as regarded the Adela. He had sent for Hunter, who,
however, did not understand readily the case, or what was wanted.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 286
Lieutenant-Colonel Rutherford B. Hayes to Sophia Birchard Hayes, July 29, 1862
Camp Green Meadows, July 29, 1862.
Dear Mother: —
I received a letter from you dated the 17th July — one from William dated 22d
July, and another from you dated June 3, yesterday. I begin to have hopes that
your birthday letter may yet turn up. Letters are rarely lost, even in this
region. The Rebels captured one of our mails early in May, and may have got
your letter.
I am glad you are enjoying so much. It is not at all
unlikely that I may have an opportunity to visit you in August or September for
a day or two. I shall do so if it is possible without neglecting duty.
We are not as busy here as we would like to be, but we are
delightfully camped, and among a friendly people. The greater part of them are
preparing to move to Ohio and Indiana, fearing that we may go off and let the
Rebels in to destroy them. We receive many letters at this camp from Rebels who
are in Camp Chase as prisoners. Their wives and relatives call almost daily to
inquire about them and for letters.
Last Sunday I dined at a Union citizen's near here. There
were eleven women there whose husbands or brothers were at Camp Chase. I took
over a lot of letters for them. Some were made happy, others not so. There had
been sickness and death at the prison, and the letters brought tears as well as
smiles.
Good-bye. — Affectionately, your son,
Rutherford.
Mrs. Sophia Hayes.
SOURCE: Charles Richard Williams, editor, Diary and
Letters of Rutherford Birchard Hayes, Volume 2, p. 312-3
Monday, March 6, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Friday, April 24, 1863
Little of importance at the Cabinet meeting. Seward left
early. He seemed uneasy, and I thought was apprehensive I might bring up the
subject of the Peterhoff mails. It suits him better to have interviews with the
President alone than with a full Cabinet, especially on points where he knows
himself wrong. I did not feel particularly anxious that the subject should be
introduced to-day, for I am not fully prepared with my reply, though busily
occupied on the subject-matter, giving it every moment I can spare from
pressing current business.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 285-6
Sunday, March 5, 2017
Diary of Gideon Welles: Thursday, April 23, 1863
Favorable, though not very important, news from lower
Virginia and North Carolina.
My letter of the 2d and telegram of the 15th to Porter have
been effective. The steamers have run past Vicksburg, and I hope we may soon
have something favorable from that quarter.
Senator Sumner called this p.m. to talk over the matter of
the Peterhoff mail. Says he has been examining the case, that he fully indorses
my views. Seward, he avers, knows nothing of international law and is wanting
in common sense, treats grave questions lightly and without comprehending their
importance and bearings. He calls my attention to the opinion of
Attorney-General Wirt as to the rights of the judiciary.
SOURCE: Gideon Welles, Diary of Gideon Welles,
Secretary of the Navy Under Lincoln and Johnson, Vol. 1: 1861 – March 30,
1864, p. 285
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)